Latest Posts
One moment pls. Loading 10 latest posts...
Showing posts with label Movies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Movies. Show all posts

14 April 2013

SAVING GENERAL YANG [Mov][HK][2013][O] Funn Lim

Written by Funn Lim

"But somehow, in the end the movie does feel 2D instead of 3D in terms of character."


SPOILERS ... SPOILERS ... SPOILERS





Just saw this movie.

My reaction;

1. Someone made notes from The Two Towers and 300.

2. Looks epic but not at the epic scale of Return Of The King. It is Two Towers in essence.

3. hated the maze like fort.

4. For all the hoopla about everybody including and especially Raymond lam, Raymond was only the one next to the secondary. The main one was Wu Chun actually and I thought wow, Linda Chung in drag! But no one ever mentioned the main idol here, that is Adam Cheng. Adam Cheng's 1 scene could out act everybody in this movie, EVERYBODY.

5. Dubbing was terrible, even actors dubbing themselves, like Ekin who sounds bored. Raymond however did well in my opinion but too little.

6. All sons had little personality, no time to develop on them. But I shall scream if I see another obligatory each son 1 shot whenever they fight, run, pose, whatever.

7. Death scenes were done very well, very sad. BUT the story is amazingly underdevelop. I wonder why? Not enough time? 

8. Ekin is perfectly cast as eldest son, heroic, serious, etc and he is the lead by poster definition BUT if only his acting can match that look he has. And I don't get why everyone is so eager to die in this movie. In the end rendered pointless because of what the father did. Was it worth it? I don't think so.

9. Love some original fighting scenes; like the fight in the fields, the last fight between 6th son and enemy where he used al his brother's and his father's weapon to fight the bad guy. I thought that was the best and more representative scene of this movie where not one son is volunteering to die but rather worked together as one albeit through weapons. That scene alone made this movie wonderful.

10. And the the stupid ending stupify it all. That mother hugging the dead husband never once asked... "Where is eldest? Where is second? Where is third? Where is fourth? Where is fifth? Where is seventh? Where are my sons?!" and just touched the husband tenderly. Like to hell with my sons as long as I get my husband's body back. Very cold.

In summary, this could have been a great movie. I mean it looks good, the costumes look good (how come villain's ear's not pierced?, Most actors were good despite lack of development and personality and none of them look alike as brothers except for 6th and 7th,. Death scenes were heart wrenching although I hated the 300-ish meeting with the soothsayer scene and the whole father I am dead I am in your dreams then I argue with my alter ego dream like scene which takes away the harsh reality of the fact that his sons were facing imminent death just to rescue him alone, and female characters who were non existent and the worst casting of the mother. I thought she was Cheng Pei Pei and then I saw she wasn't. Why not FIND Cheng Pei Pei? I will pay to see her sit on Adam's lap! Although it is a bit borrowed from some big Hollywood movies, I appreciate the effort to make the movie look epic and cinematic. And I love the first throw bags into air and shoot with arrows and throw with fire and burn all enemy scene.

But somehow, in the end the movie does feel 2D instead of 3D in terms of character. The story is flawed too. Yue Fei dying I understand but the sons and father dying didn't make enough sense to justify tear fest. But it is in the end one of the best chinese movie of recent years because it looks like a movie.

SADDEST DEATH SCENE
Ekin eventhough his eagerness to sacrifice himself is troubling. If he had known 7th have died, would he stop and think maybe that fortune teller dude needs to be trashed?

MOST SHOCKING DEATH SCENE
Not sure which son, the one aka Legolas.

BEST FIGHT SCENE
The 6th and enemy man to man fight with his brothers and father's weapons/.

CHEESIEST DEATH SCENE
Was it 4th and 5th off the cliff? If yes, that one. Quite funny.

BEST PROP
The horses and they were real

WORST PROP
The women. You see them, but they have nothing much to do.

MOST USELESS CHARACTER
The Emperor

MOST CLIFF HANGER OF ALL CLIFF HANGERS
Did 5th and 6th die? My friend said in another version 5th became a monk, 6th married the enemy's princess? Is it true? In fact my friend said 7 will go, 6th will return when actually  3 didn't die, out of which 5th became a monk and so stopped being Yang and 4th married the enemy's princess and so stopped being a Yang and only 6th came home. True?

MOST EFFECTIVE INEFFECTIVE VILLAIN
That chancellor? Minister? We all know he's a villain but he is just there, nothing to do

MOST OVERLY USED MOMENTS
The posing scenes. Each has his own focus. And the top off scene. For some unknown reasons a son suddenly take his top off and fight the air. But a lot were like pose and pose and pose. Most poses came from the Legolas dude and dear 5th son (often close ups)

MOST FAVOURITE SON
For me, was Ray the 5th son? Because he can fight AND he is ready to die AND he died with a smile AND he is a doctor AND GOD DAMN IT, this is one of Ray's less pretentious performance!

BEST PERFORMANCE
Adam Cheng. The rest can just hang around him as posse as they are.

WORST ACTING
The mother.


VERDICT
Highly recommended but definitely not as great as some fans say it is. But it is better than a lot of other Chinese movies out there.

P/S 
I notice different country different person at the front of the poster. In Malaysia Ekin is at the front. Taiwan? Probably Vic Zhou? I couldn't recognise Zai Zai!
Share:

22 November 2010

HARRY POTTER & THE DEATHLY HALLOWS PART 1 [O]

Written by Funn Lim




"But I would have hoped another 20 minutes on the above scenes would have made this movie into a brilliant one. Do read the book to fill in the gaps."








SPOILERS ... SPOILERS ... SPOILERS


RELEASE
2010

THIS IS ...
An opinion/review on the 1st part of the movie on the 7th and fina; Harry Potter book

MORE INFO
Here at imdb.com

COMMENT
I just rushed to watch Harry Potter & The Deathly Hollows Part 1 and I am very very impressed with David Yates who in movie 6 managed to show the scale of Hogwarts and in Movie 7 managed to show the urgency of the situation at hand. It is a scary loud movie and at times tender and incredibly manages to be funny as well thanks to Rupert Grint. I believe he has taken the essence of the book or half of it and made it almost as good as the book. Luckily this last book has 2 movies treatment because 1 movie does it no justice. Most scenes in the book are in this movie. So I am very very pleased. However a few major problems or rather details in the book not included, therefore made the movie less than the book and sometimes incoherent;

1. I believe Wormtail's death in the movie is different, if he is dead. He should be since in the book he is dead in that scene except he didn't die the way he did in the movie. By changing the way he died changes the entire relationship between Wormtail and Harry and the ruthlessness of Voldemort, that he will even kill a loyal servant, that Wormtail died because of a moment of mercy he showed on Harry. In the movie he died very very differently and rather meaninglessly.

2. After being taunted by Voldemort who appeared out of Regulus Black's locket, Ron actually destroyed that Hocrux and cried. He actually cried and wept as Harry told him quietly that he loved Herminone as a sister and he heard Hermione crying sometimes, missing Ron. That's when Ron knew for sure Hermione and Harry didn't have any relationship as taunted by Voldemort. The significance of that scene is Ron's real feelings, and how he was taunted so cruelly and how Harry responded. However the movie for whatever reason did not show Ron crying or Harry's consoling words. I find it a bit cold. It was Ron's moment, and he should have had that moment.

3. In the beginning when Dudley was leaving, his unrepentant parents did not bother to say goodbye to Harry, but Dudley rushed over and in his way apologised for the years of abuse of Harry. It was a closure for Harry and for his only living relatives, one of whom Dudley. It also shows to us a changed Dudley, capable of good things perhaps, we may never know since we never heard from him again. It was Dudley's big scene and this movie for whatever reason decided to summarise this and totally cut that out. I find it terrible, that in the Dudley remained the same when in the book he changed after the Dementors attacked him.

4. The entire back story of Regulus and how he betrayed Voldemort and stole the Hocrux from the cave and his relationship with Kreacher which shows Kreacher somewhat in a good light was cut out totally. We know who was RAB but we don't know how Regulus got the Hocrux and I doubt part 2 will explain that. This is significant because Regulus was like Sirius, born into a dark arts pure blood family but chose to sacrifice themselves for goodness. I hope part 2 retains the scene how Kreacher is treated with respect and in one of the best scene in the book, how Kreacher led the fight against the pure bloods.

5. I am not sure if it will be in part 2 but I hope the conversation with Ollivander and the role of Griphook will be given justice. I am not happy how Griphook's role in denying the Gryffindor sword in Bellatrix's hands is fake and not the real one. There is a significance since Griphook being a goblin would not have helped a wizard to lie but he helped Harry. That was cut from this movie.

6. I am sorely disappointed the scene where Harry saw Luna's bedroom and saw her sketched of Harry, Hermione, Ron and I think Neville with the words like best friends or something was cut out. That scene was touching to show Harry felt an enormous gratitude to Luna for believing in him and he felt a rush of affection for Luna hence his closeness and friendliness with Luna. I would have wished Harry ended up with Luna.

7. The most significant of all, Harry's anger when he saw Mad Eye's fake eye on the door of Delores Umbridge's office. How his cover was broken was when angrily he ripped the eye out to take with him, angry at how Mad Eye was killed. That scene was missing and the eye remained there on the door. I find that cold and not very like Harry.

8. The entire story of Bill and Fleur just sort of appeared. Might as well just write them off.

9. Why the significance of the visit of Rufus Scrimgeour to Harry is cut out is beyond me. The great thing about this book is it shows how even supposedly people on the good guys' side will use ruthless means to a desired end. Rufus was supposed to get Harry to stand on the Ministry of Magic's side as their poster boy, but Harry rightly refused. This scene is significant. And Rufus' death is even more significant since he knew where Harry was but supposedly he was tortured to death but he didn't betray Harry which made Harry realised he may have been too harsh on Rufus Scrimgeour. I love Bill Nighy but he played this character like an insane sort of guy. The guy in the book described as lion like would have been more formidable looking.

I still feel Harry is lacking the anger and emotional turmoil although Daniel Radcliffe was funny when he had to be different characters. He has a gift for comedy. But the dramatic acting is still lacking. Rupert Grint lacked some anger in some pivotal scenes but frankly he is the best actor of the younger actors. He has serious talent in comedy and I think he did well. Emma Watson improved and I love the fact that the scene of her wiping out her memory from her parents was included in the movie, shows the urgency of the situation and the sadness. However she is way too serious to be the level headed Hermione I know from the books. Good thing is that in Book 7 Hermione has to be so serious looking. But I still don't like Emma Watson who still doesn't seem where to stand in a room full of people; she looked awkward. The adults were all great even if their role is reduced. Helen McCrory was a miscast and also terribly underused.

Anyway I felt some scenes were great, like when Harry, Ron and Hermione drank Polyjuice potion and entered Ministry of Magic as 3 adults and these 3 actors portrayed the 3 younger actors' personalities perfectly! I love how Snape appeared. I love all those scary scenes were not deleted but in fact played out in full. I really love how the 3 brothers' story were told in animation and I find that creative and artistic. I love Dobby! And when he died I was very sad, I was sadder reading his death but the movie did the scene justice. When Hedwig fell from the sky I was in shock eventhough I knew that was coming. I like the fact that Fred and George are given something to do than to just stand around like in previous movies. I dread Part 2 because of what is coming for the twins. I cannot stand Ginny so I am glad her role is minimal. The most waste of space of the role of Narcissa. No dialogue at all, just wallpaper. Draco had some scene but not enough. And I thought Dumbledore was buried standing up instead of laying down. And most of all, the last scene should not have ended with Voldemort getting the elder wand, it should have been a long or far shot of Hogwarts since Part 2 will deal with the great battle at Hogwarts and the destruction of further Hocrux and a major revelation.

I have a feeling the director will manage that well but I hope Neville will be given his day of glory and Ron as well. Very significant roles as well for Mrs Weasley. But I really want Neville to have his day. And more importantly, Snape. This will be Snape's moment and I hope this movie, after 7 movies will not screw up Snape's big moment and the answer to why he did what he did.

Anyway for all my complaints, Part 1 is a great adaptation. You can't have it all, especially for such a rich book as this one. But I would have hoped another 20 minutes on the above scenes would have made this movie into a brilliant one. Do read the book to fill in the gaps.



Fast Payday
Powered by: Fast payday loans
Share:

HEAR ME [Mov][Chi]

Written by Bridget Au


"The movie manages genuine surprise in its final act and because we’ve grown to care about the characters so much that by that time, something poignant, maybe even magical, is felt."





SPOILERS ... SPOILERS ... SPOILERS


Chinese Title
“Ting Shuo” (I heard)

Genre
Romance

Year
2009

Origin
Taiwan

Cast
Eddie Peng
Ivy Chen
Michelle Chen
Lo Bei-an
Lin Mei Shiu

Foreword
It’s been awhile since I cried at a movie. An excellent example of when less is more.

Review
Recent entries in Taiwanese cinema have been impressive (Cape No. 7, Secret and this year’s smash hit Monga) and now Hear Me can add itself to the list of reasons to watch Taiwanese movies. There’s nothing that new in here, but the movie is well-made enough that you think you are watching something new.

Eddie Peng is Tian Huo, a local delivery boy who meets and falls in love with Yang Yang (Ivy Chen), a girl who is working numerous jobs to raise funds to send her sister to the Deaflympics. Tian Huo is immature and not that bright, but his unconditional love for Yang Yang and the way he interacts with his parents – who clearly dote on their only son – is pleasant to watch and makes him a very likeable male lead.

The sister relationship between Yang Yang and Xiao Peng was equally engaging. Well-written and thoughtful, their relationship offers the opportunity to present revelations about the barriers that people with hearing disabilities face, such as the sisters living in a flat with basically no rooms, as deaf people prefer to be able to see everything in their surroundings. The movie never tries to fish for audience sympathy, but they get it anyway, as the way these barriers are presented in a way that is simple and unpretentious.

Hear Me reminds me a bit of Korea’s …ing, where nothing really happens in terms of plot until later in the movie, but the simplicity of the story, heartfelt performances and portrayal of Taiwan’s underprivileged urban charm is honest and genuine, which is appreciated in today’s world of brouhaha film-making. The fact that the movie manages to affect even though most of the story happens in silence (since most of the dialogue is communicated via sign language) is even more impressive.

For some reason, Asian actors are ace performers at portraying people with disabilities who use sign language (Yuko Fueki in Wuri’s Family, Julian Cheung in Return of the Cuckoo, and Fala Chen in Moonlight Resonance), and Hear Me is no exception. Michelle Chen delivers her best performance to date as the deaf Xiao Peng, although there is a bit too much head-jerking in some scenes. Eddie Peng continues to improve and he is charming, cheerful, and aw-shucks likeable as the juvenile but optimistic Tian Huo.

The big plus is Ivy Chen, who performs admirably as the timid, thoughtful Yang Yang. Her acting is infused with a total lack of pretension and raw emotions, and it also helps that she looks like she walked out of an anime production. And Lo Bei-an and Lin Mei Shiu, who portray Tian Huo’s parents, are warm and funny, and although their characters are sometimes nagging and long-winded, they clearly consider Tian Huo’s happiness their chief priority, which is refreshing.

The movie manages genuine surprise in its final act (and for once I won’t ruin it for you in this review) and because we’ve grown to care about the characters so much that by that time, something poignant, maybe even magical, is felt. All you need is love.

To Watch or Not to Watch, That is the Question
Highly recommended.

Rating
5/5

Fast Payday
Powered by: Fast payday loans

Share:

14 November 2010

LOVE IN DISGUISE [Mov][Chi]

Written by Funn Lim





"And if you ask me, this is not a Wang Lee Hom movie. Nope. It is a Wang Lee Hom DOCUMENTARY."










SPOILERS ... SPOILERS ... SPOILERS


Chinese title
Lian Ai Tong Gao

Let me guess, literally translated as "A Notice/Order For Romance". I like the English title though.

Released in
2010


Directed by
Leehom Wang

Writing credits
Hung-chieh Chen, Xin Yi Du, Leehom Wang

Cast-Character
Taken from IMDB.com

Leehom Wang ... Du Ming-Han
Yifei Liu ... Song Xiao-Qing
Joan Chen ... Joan
Han Dian Chen ... Wei Zhi-Bai
Khalil Fong
Zhenyu Qiao ... Mu Fan
Na Xie
Yike Zeng ... Xiao Tao

Summary
From GSC movies

Du Minghan (Wang Leehom) is a famous celebrity pop star and with the help of his agent, Joan (Joan Chen), his career took off amazingly.

When he accidentally met the plain looking Song Xiaoqing (Crystal Liu), he immediately fell in love with her and decides to disguise himself as a student, Ah De, together with his best pal (Chen Han Dian).

Will Xiaoqing ever find out the truth of Ah De's real identity? Will she be able to accept him for who he is?

Comment
I hope the above is not the official summary because reading that summary I felt like I was watching a different movie.

Let me say this out clearly; I do not doubt Wang Lee Hom as a musician. I admire his musical abilities, I was his fan until he became like every Taiwanese pop star with the melancholic love songs, I really miss his earlier works. I may have doubts over his lyrics writing skills but I do not doubt his voice and his melodies so to speak. But I wonder who suggested to him that he can write, direct AND star in a movie that I believe he himself feels strongly for (as he should as this is his baby) and I believe his fans will eagerly watch and buy and keep and promote and praise till no end in sight but the general populace like myself may just feel the only reason he got this weak script made into a movie and directed by himself, a first time director and directing himself no less is purely because of his popularity as a musician. I will not even call him a singer, he is above that and again that I do not doubt. It is obvious if this script came from a Mr Up And Coming Nobody, it would not have been made into a movie without at least a complete overhaul of the plot plus a few rewrites. Not that it was awful.

For a first time director, and an occasional actor, Wang Lee Hom did a fair job but that is me being kind because I like him. Truthfully the movie is incoherent at times, inconsistent mostly and uniformly messy. Oh yes, it can be messy and yet organised mess.

I will save my breath over the story; it is simply a pop star meets ordinary pretty girl, goes looking for her, falls for her, juggles between 2 identities and realises the times he was in disguise is his real self, and in the end manages to get the girl and saves the music university from total and absolute annihilation due to unpopularity of Chinese music instruments in the face of modern R&B and hip hop and what nots. In the middle he crammed some stuff on the difficulties of being a pop star like constantly surrounded by rumours that are not true, paparazzis as well as snotty classically trained musicians versus famous pop stars seemingly without musical credentials. And above all that he crammed in as well the meaning of music, the making of music and the flow of music through visuals and some imagination sequences.

And if you ask me, this is not a Wang Lee Hom movie. Nope. It is a Wang Lee Hom DOCUMENTARY. Take away Crystal Liu and the half baked love story and what you really have is a musician's take on a musical journey through the eyes of a musician that is Wang Lee Hom.

And that is what I like about this movie. Everytime he sings, he plays the piano, plays the Chinese violin, performs or in Du Ming Han mode, he is at his best because that is not acting; that is Wang Lee Hom being Wang Lee Hom. But when he is far away from a musical instrument or a stage or not in a performance, quite frankly I have no idea what he is doing onscreen. As an actor, he must work on his diction. I can understand Joan Chen and Crystal Liu and everybody else perfectly but Lee Hom gave me problems; half the time I have no idea what he was saying. He sounds lazy and he speaks like he sings. Which is why I said I doubt his lyrics writing ability quite simply because half the time I can't understand him. You can compare him with the other musical thespian more famous than he is who wrote, directed and starred in his own movie that is Jay Chou except these days I can understand Jay Chou better. I think working for Zhang Yimou really helps with his music and acting performances. Of course Lee Hom can boast he worked for Ang Lee too but seriously, in that movie that shall not be named, I didn't quite bother with his presence.

That is not to say he isn't charming. There are some funny scenes; like how one overeager designer dressed him in various impossible fashion to disguise his real identity. That scene is funny but in the end meaningless and darn ridiculous. Such an image consultant/designer will not get hired for those ridiculous fashion. And the actress was way over the top in her performance which for a moment made me wonder if this a slapstick comedy?

And yet the whole thing came crashing down to earth when he entered the university and had his I suppose first taste of Chinese music eventhough his concert at the beginning incorporated those elements already. Was he playing the Monkey God in the beginning? Anyway the improptu performance he gave to the headmaster together with his best friend guitarist showed that his Du Ming Han is quite well versed with Chinese instruments. And that was this movie's best scene. What a fun musical session! So I wonder, what motivates him to join the university? To get the girl? And yet he said he just wanted to be her friend, somewhere along the way he felt jealous when he saw a fellow student touching her and so there began the very short courtship.

And then the movie changed mode and focused on the troubles of the university; like some statement given by a serious musician, that youngsters today have no appreciation for classical music, in this case the Chinese classical music being our roots and our culture and so the musical event organised by the headmaster (who so happens to be the father of the girl of his dreams) was heading into trouble as the headmaster lamented the lack of students. And yet in the beginning when Du Ming Han was walking amongst the students I see plenty of students, many of them quite young. So if there is a lack of enrolment I wonder is the headmaster hoping for 200% enrolment? The solution to the headmaster's problem is Du Ming Han himself performing at the event to draw in youngsters but as far as I am concerned, apart from perhaps 2 modern music blended with the chinese classical music, he then performed his love ode to his dream girl on a piano in a rather modern sort of way, with lyrics written by her of course. She felt moved and so ran back to him. The anger, the pain, the rejection, the confusion, the betrayal, the humiliation, all solved with 1 song and I suppose in 1 or 2 days. I find that rather simplistic.

And that is why I find this movie lacking. It thrives to be important, expounding his views on classical music versus modern music and the amalgamation of these 2 different worlds into great tunes and yet at the same time filled it with nonsense such as needless slapstick and confusing visuals that made me think "are they on drugs?" and some surface wise heavy themes but looking deep down is just touch and go issues. All wrapped up in a friendly fan pleasing love story that neither advances his musical theory or impeding it; just that it was that. It is like as if the musician him is struggling with the popular him; do I make a movie about my passion or a movie to please others? Hence the confusing script.

You know a production that better illustrate this point? The Korean dramedy, Oh! My Lady. That series made the love affair between a hot young pop star and an older woman with child more believable, probably because it has a better script, better acted and a few more hours to tell the story properly. Or maybe, just maybe it doesn't pretend to be some social commentary and is just what it is.

However I like some visuals from this movie. The sequences where Ming Han was very seduced by the music played by Xiao Qing or the masters at the university. Lee Hom filled that with butterflies and the best of course a painting being painted, Chinese style as his character flew in it. There is promise in the visuals, you can feel his passion for this sort of music. And then the love story had to butt into that part and I felt rather ambushed by it.

There are however some visuals I didn't get. Like when Xiao Qing heard her lyrics being turned into a song in the hall, suddenly rain fell on her as she walked. She was wet. When she went back to Ming Han on the stage, she was still very wet. So when the whole sequence of rain falling on her and her alone, it was real?! And then they hugged, happily and immediately his fans roared with approval. Seriously, really? Why not try and get Wang Lee Hom to do that to rumoured girlfriend Crystal on the concert stage for real and let's see if the roar of approval is instantenous because I will bet it won't be. At least a 10 seconds silence or shock would be more realistic. His manager, Joan Chen crying alone when she found out he lied to her and willing to abandon his pop star status for love and I was thinking is she in love with him or is she just crying her rice bowl may break? When his car hit Xiao Qing she stayed on the road underneath the car to play the Chinese piano to which Ming Han heard and saw butterflies. I was like again, seriously? How cliche is that? And then he went in search of her, calling her an inspiration when I never got the impression he lacked inspiration at all. Maybe showing him as a talented but somehow down on his luck musician may better illustrate his need to find her or maybe a talentless pop star who actually has talent buried underneath when he heard her music and was inspired by it. As it is I don't see the motivation except a pop star on a self indulgent spree.

And that is basically what this movie is; an indulgent.

Performances wise, Joan Chen was wonderful as she should be.

Crystal Liu is mesmerising. I find her beautiful, intelligent looking and graceful. She gives me an impression she is classically trained musician herself because she was convincing when playing the chinese piano. A pity her character is so poorly written. No doubt she is in almost every single scene and yet I felt unsatisfied; I thought she was underused. She may be in each scene but she really had nothing much to do. Even when she had something to do like looking at the snotty classical trained senior, I was thinking if Xiao Qing in awe of him? In love with him? She lacked expressions thus making her a competent mesmerizing actress but not necessarily a great one. Something was missing. And in the end at the final concert I was hoping she would duet with Lee Hom's Ming Han like in earlier scenes but she was reduced to an angry jilted lover seduced by his love song and so rushed to him to love him back. I find that nonsensical. How great it would have been to have them as equals in music; she in classical music, he in modern music, both finding a common thread in music as the basis for their love and devotion for one another. Except it ended with them kissing, lamely if I might add with the whole paparazzi looking on. And frankly that is one message Lee Hom can bear in mind next time he is kissing someone he doesn't want her seen; just let them take the pictures. However one can't always live the life one preaches. I quite detest him for reducing Crystal into a prop; a prop that is sometimes dressed in her I suppose most famous role, Xiao Long Nu.

Lee Hom himself is not terrible. Some reviewers did note that he had no problems parodying himself or rather making himself as the joke and for that I applaud him. But I didn't like how he imagined he strangled the paparazzi who dared ask him about his rumoured relationships after a successful concert. That is not funny and I feel a tad crass. I don't believe Lee Hom is such a person. I find him classy and intelligent and very patient looking. Whatever anger issues he harboured, I believe this is the first I see, on screen. And since this is to be a documentary or a biopic on him, that may be his real feelings. But what do you expect from a life as an entertainer? You're public property, whether you like it or not. Your musical abilities confirms your talent but what fuels you is your popularity and that is derived from press' opinion of you. As they always say, bad publicity is better than no publicity at all. He tries very hard in this movie of his; he cast the right people, he writes the right music, he chooses the right subject but in the end as a director he was inadequate. Sometimes another person may be able to realise one's own vision so to relinquish the baton of directorship may have been the movie's best move. It is just silly how he narrates the movie, lost the narration half way, ends it with narration again, all those dream sequences (some well done and quite relevant) and the worst move, adding title sequences between scenes ala Babe to make a point, of which I really didn't quite care. His performance is ok but his story and directorship is everywhere. Which makes this movie nowhere.

You know what would have been a better movie that would serve his purpose of the debate of classical versus modern music and explaining his views why it doesn't matter? A real documentary. A documentary of a famous musician cum pop star from Taiwan called Wang Lee Hom on a journey of musical discovery through Chinese classical music and how in the end he discovered himself along the way, showing in visuals how he sees classical music, sequences on how he merges these two mediums and ends with a mini concert and an album. In between he can talk about his approach to music, why Chinese classical music, his vision, his hopes, his dreams. Like a 2 hour special, except with widescreen treament in the cinema with premieres and stuff. That sort of documentary can be released in cinemas and if well directed, could also be submitted for considertion of the Academy Awards for Documentaries. Rarely do I see a pop star approach in classical settings and moreover, who better than Wang Lee Hom, himself I believe has classical roots? After all he is not just a pretty face or a pop star, he is a serious musician who writes good music. That would have been a great "movie", one I would gladly watch in the cinemas.

A great pity of the potential this could have been.

Verdict
Musically, heavenly. Acting wise, hit and mostly miss thanks to a poor predictable superficial script. Entertainment wise, the music works, the movie itself failed. Overall, the full movie is strictly for fans but some parts are worth a watch. Now hoping someone would just cut out those musical parts and that 30 minutes or so would have my seal of approval as one of the best "musical" ever.

INTERESTING MUSIC
Frankly I can't differentiate between hip hop and R&B so to me an addictive tune is a good tune.

My favourite from the movie is not the main ballad which is to me typical Wang Lee Hom but the other one, the one he sang with the Chinese orchestra. Found it! Thanks to chriztna and juljin79 for the tip. The title is 十八般武艺 which is the title of his album. The chorus is awesome with his falsetto but the starting not quite. I hate the woah! and I wish he uses less autotune because it does sound like autotune and quite mechanical at parts. If it is not autotune then I am not sure why he sounds too manufactured. English, Chinese lyrics all here. Did he sing all that?! By the way the English translation I believe is literal.



CLEAR VERSION
Click the embedded player to listen. If there is one great thing about Love In Disguise, it is this song, 十八般武艺 which becomes better with each listen. I was curious what the title means and the translator just says "Be Versatile" although the literal translation is 18 Martial Arts. I wonder is that actually meaning "Be Versatile"?






Fast Payday
Powered by: Fast payday loans
Share:

25 August 2010

INCEPTION [Mov]

Written by Funn Lim


"Whilst Inception is not the most important movie or best movie as it has its flaws and some questionable casting decisions, no doubt it is a very enjoyable movie that makes you think."





SPOILERS ... SPOILERS ... SPOILERS



Released in
2010

Language
English

Director
Christopher Nolan

Writer
Christopher Nolan

Cast-Character
Leonardo DiCaprio ... Cobb
Joseph Gordon-Levitt... Arthur
Ellen Page ... Ariadne
Tom Hardy ... Eames
Ken Watanabe ... Saito
Dileep Rao ... Yusuf
Cillian Murphy ... Robert Fischer
Tom Berenger ... Peter Browning
Marion Cotillard ... Mal
Pete Postlethwaite ... Maurice Fischer
Michael Caine ... Miles
Lukas Haas ... Nash
Tai-Li Lee ... Tadashi
Claire Geare ... Phillipa (3 years)
Magnus Nolan ... James (20 months)

Plot Summary
From imdb.com

In a world where technology exists to enter the human mind through dream invasion, a highly skilled thief is given a final chance at redemption which involves executing his toughest job till date, Inception.

Story Summary
Complete spoilers for those who can't understand the movie, check out imdb.com

Comments
I had to suspend my disbelief that you can actually kidnap someone, inject that someone with something, share a dream and find confidential information inside that subconcious mind in the dreamworld of this kidnapped person, in a world of corporate espisionage. Also that an "architect" can actually build layers upon sub layers of this dream world and convincing the dreamer that it is his dream and when it is somebody else's. Definitely a new cooler way of corporate espisionage and the movie doesn't bother in explaining the basics, just that they are and everybody seems to know there are such methods.

The reception for this movie is beyond critical success; some went further to say it is perhaps one of the most important movies of modern age, an instant classic, etc. Now this is a good movie but the most important in the sense of The Matrix that made you question your very existence? I doubt it.

What makes this a good movie it is a story well told, disguised in great special effects, some competent to good acting and set in a world that anything can happen and does and an ending that will be debated till the ends of earth that only the director can answer whether did Cobb really reunite with his children or was it a dream? My sister even went as far to say this is a story of the mind of a schizophrenic, nothing is real, nothing happened, just in his mind. Others would say earlier parts happened but the ending whether real or not depending on how you interprete the spinning top, some said it was still spinning meaning it is not real, some said it falters a bit and so it is real. Some noticed Cobb wears a ring in real world but not in the dream world, some said you never see the children's faces in dream world and they looked like they never grew up in even the ending thus it is fake. Some said the children wore different clothings so it must be real.

Whatever your opinion of the ending may be, the clever director who also gave us the puzzle movie, The Prestige achieved what he desired; this is one much talked about movie. My personal opinion? I like the idea that my sister proposed; he is a schizophrenic but no way the movie seems to point to that direction. I like to believe the ending is a happy one that he did reunite with his children, the spinning top did falter towards the end.

No doubt, such questions, probably will be answered in the 10th anniversary with the re-release of this movie is whatever format we will be using in future. The actors certainly didn't say anything. Argue away!

Back to the movie itself, like I said, it is full of great special effects. It looks good on screen and I can't fault the vision, the presentation.

However the narration and the story is a bit confusing. For one, it is difficult to accept the concept at fave value. If you could, then there's the question of very confusing "whose dream are we in now?" sort of way. Even if we ignore that, I was very bored with the reoccurence of Mal, Cobb's dead wife. She was intriguing at first but the ending scene of her arguing maybe he is in the real world and Cobb said no he knows he isn't because Mal in the real world killed herself so she is not real, she is just a representation of his guilt, therefore his totem (one item to remind the person whether they're in real or dream world), the entire scene felt like a fan fiction story come true, those sort you and I often write about as amateur. But there was nothing amateur about that scene, except it was very very long and became very very tedious. I was very bored with the character Mal and in the end I sorta realised I never knew the real Mal since she died. The Mal we knew was from his memories, from his guilty conscience and she was from the start a facade, nothing real. Even some flashback scenes on what happened to her and why she killed herself, and how Cobb said he could carry out the inception because he did it before seems rather forced. How did he actually did that? Putting an idea in a safe etc. That's what I mean when the story does not even explain the technically, just know that it is. And frankly, Marion Cotillard is beautiful no doubt, but I am not wowed by her acting. Since I am already irritated with the character of Mal and her irritating presence in the movie which breaks the narration rather than moving it along, Marion Cotillard didn't help matters with her how shall I put it? Her accent? I find it difficult to follow not because I could not understand her but because I could not stand the amount of time for her to finish her lines. And now I heard she may be catwoman. Why bother with the mask then? Since anyone can recognise her from the way she speaks. And Leonardo Di Caprio and Marion Cotillard shares zero chemistry; they could play complete strangers for all I know. Husband and wife is not believable at all. As to how she died, it wasn't such a big shocking mystery to me. I find it rather ridiculous anyway that her death was caused by her belief she is still in a dream, she needs to wake up by killing herself which she did. That is because frankly I couldn't buy the concept of a continous dream.

The movie presents to us the hypothesis that we can live our entire lives in a dream, from young to old for decades in a matter of minutes because in dreams world moves slower. And the deeper level of subconcious you go, the longer the time, to the point you can wake up losing your mind because in your dreams you would have probably lived a lifetime. It doesn't explain though do you or can you die in your dream from old age and what happens after? Another level of dream, deeper still? It does explain to wake up you need to kill yourself so imagine how many times Cobb did that. But by killing yourself when you're in a deep sleep means you will go to the deepest level of I suppose subconcious where it is like hell from the way it is described. In fact the levels of dreams felt like description of purgatory and hell whilst it may be heaven to some. You as the dreamer is the architect of your own dream, every character, every building, you subconciously placed them there. For most their dreams is based on reality although you can bend space, time, matter, etc. Sounds like The Matrix to me except Matrix is not a dream but a world created by machines to trick men into believing that's the real world. I can see where's the inspiration of Inception. But Inception itself presents this hypothesis as is; so I just watch it as is. But somehow in my mind I kept thinking are we capable of one continous dream as presented by the movie? Can our dreams be shared? Apparently it can be. When we wake up will we be so consumed by the perfect world in our dreams which in turn is based on reality that we will turn mad or in denial like Mal? Is it even possible? I haven't had a dream where it is one continous dream with consistent people in it. I wish I could do that.

This does make the movie an attractive one doesn't it? Strangely though since it is your dream so to speak, how come they can be attacked by guns etc? Can't they fight back by asking the architect to dream them a bigger gun or change the scenario or something? Or is the architect bound by her own creation; once in motion, she can't change it?

I have more questions but ignoring these technicalities, I find the movie very entertaining and nail biting because of the action stuff going on. Sort of like James Bond in a dream sort of action. However, one ridiculous moment had to be the moment(s) where we see 3 subconcious levels together; the van driver Yusuf and the van falling into the river which takes forever, Arthur gathering the sleeping ones in level 2 into an elevator where earlier I heard he has only minutes but it went on forever, the centre at the snow area for level 3 and in the end of course Cobb finding Saito in level 4. The scene of the van falling into the river was taking forever but the one that annoyed me was the level 2 elevator scene, it really felt like forever.

I must note the great special effect scene which is the one where Ariadne bending the streets as they fell on top of the other creating a perfect symmerty. Great scene.

In restrospect, we know so little of the characters don't we?

As for the performances, there seems to be a collection of Oscar winners, nominees and what nots. Doesn't make them all great.

Marion Cotillard is not my favourite so frankly I didn't enjoy her performance. Moreover, let me be petty; Mal isn't exactly a name that can elicit pity or any sort of emotion.

Ken Watanabe I never liked frankly but from the looks of it he is Hollywood's favourite Japanese actor, probably the only Japanese actor. I find him a bit too dramatic and his English is also a problem.

Leonardo Di Caprio is a good actor but I think he is a miscast in this movie. He can't do angst well and his character is full of it. Rumour has it Christian Bale was supposed to be in this movie but of course the director said Leo was his first choice. Christian Bale is all about angst and he will do great in the role as Cobb, on the condition he losses that breathy way he speaks ever since he plays Batman. Some viewers say the movie does not have an emotional connection, it felt cold, I disagree. I thought what more connection you want? Cobb is a tortured soul, he is angst and guilt and conscience all combined together and coupled with desperation and grief, what more? But rather it was Leo who didn't convey all these well. He sported that I don't know, that serious look throughout and nothing much. I just feel he was not Cobb and the fact that the movie felt cold was because he didn't deliver as he should.

Ellen Page plays the architect and frankly how she actually creates the dream world is skipped altogether so she spends time walking around in the movie looking like she is doing something. Then action kicks in and she is doing something and she is one character that connects with Cobb and found out his secret which I shall not reveal here. Not a secret really but how he spends his time in his dreamworld with his captive wife. And yet she manages to escape each time. Anyway Ellen Page is wasted in here.

I enjoyed Tom Hardy's role, probably one of the two "funny" ones in here that provides the lighter moments. Again exactly what he does I am not sure.

Joseph Gordon-Levitt is so grown up! I remember him as the smart aleck kid from 3rd Rock From The Sun. How time flies. He has a huge role as Cobb's assistant, even if he has very little dialogue. I enjoyed his performance. Even if he looks skinny and all, his fighting scenes, and only one that fights against gravity in this movie was very entertaining.

Pete Postlethwaite and Michael Caine both have very small roles in this movie but both did what they are paid to do effectively in the few minutes of appearance. And that was Tom Berenger? The one looking oily and sneaky? Haven't seen him in a long time, could hardly recognise him!

The one actor and one character that I was absolutely fascinated with is to me the rarely seen strange looking actor, Cillian Murphy. I didn't detect any accent at all! Anyway he has I must admit a very cold sort of face with even chilly eyes but gorgeous eye colour if you ask me. Frankly I didn't follow his career much but am glad to see him having an important role in this movie. In fact his portion of the story is the most fascinating one. The entire story is built on his character and how Cobb and gang had to plant an idea in his mind and I like his relationshiop with his father and how Cobb and gang reasoned the best way to plant the idea is to effect a reconciliation with the father in the dream when in actual fact his father couldn't care less about him. He did the dramatic bits well and his scene of reconciliation with his father was definitely the highlight of this movie with some exceptional performance from this strange looking actor. He also handled the action scenes well.

I must admit Christopher Nolan is a very good director. He brings to us fascinating stories that is not some boring rehashed stuff from other boring rehashed stuff and he always make good use in his actors and prefers casting those he has worked with. I may have my grouses with this one, calling it confusing and at times boring or rather too long on one focus until I became restless but it is nevertheless a refreshing sort of movie which emphasise on storytelling as well as presentation. Whilst Inception is not the most important movie or best movie as it has its flaws and some questionable casting decisions, no doubt it is a very enjoyable movie that makes you think. Ignore the technicalities and just go with the flow and join the debate as to whether in the end is Cobb still in his dream?

Verdict
A must see. The name Christopher Nolan itself deserves at least a view at the trailer and with such a cast, whatever I may say about them, one of them must intrigue you somehow. The story (not the technical stuff) to me is the true star of this movie. Clever stuff I must say.

free hit counter
free hit counter

Share:

24 February 2010

72 TENANTS OF PROSPERITY [Mov][HK]

Written by Funn Lim



"In fact after finishing the movie I realised the selling point of this movie is the well written witty dialogue. It looked and sounded like real effort was put in, the movie is clearly a labour of love"







SPOILERS ... SPOILERS ... SPOILERS


Released In
2009, 3 days before Chinese New Year to be exact

Language
Cantonese

Produced By
TVB I think because all the actors are TVB contracted actors or are familiar with them

Note
I can't remember the names of the characters in this movie so all the names below are taken from the Wikipedia page.

Cast-Character
Full list at Wikipedia.

Plot Summary
Taken from Wikipedia

This film used the 1973 Shaw Brothers film, The House of 72 Tenants as the blueprint. However, this story is a new creation, of which only some roles identical.

Yes, it is true. It starts with the 1973 version which we are all familiar with, with Joyce Cheng playing the same Teochew woman that her mother, Lydia Shum played in her youth. The story is similar, centering not on the eviction of 72 tenants or the corruption of the public workers (instead of firemen, in this version we have the 2 doctors from Healing Hands - Lawrence Ng and Raymond Cho if I am not mistaken demanding for bribes before administering vaccinations) but rather on Pinky, the lovely and innocent adopted daughter of the landlords (scary landlady played by Charmaine Sheh and lusty landlord played by Gordon Lam) who was forced to marry a much older but richer man but the tenants helped saved the day in the end. That was the original story. This movie continues on the basis Pinky was then pursued by sworn brothers, Ha Kung and Shek Kin, and she seems to like Shek Kin more but as both men decided to decide her fate by coin tossing and some cheating in the process, Pinky ended up marrying the shorter Ha Kung and gave birth to one son (Bosco) and one daughter (Linda) whilst Shek Kin married someone (at the start of modern times we know the wife died many years before) and has 2 children as well, one daughter (Stephy) and one son (Wong Cho Lam). What is interesting is Ha Kung the shorter one gave birth to a tall son whilst Shek Kin the taller one gave birth to a short son! Anyway they became sworn enemies and their quarrel even spilled into their handphone business, located directly opposite each other amongst the other 70 shop tenants of Sai Yeung Choi road. Thus the basis of the new 72 tenants, not tenants as in houses but tenants as in shops. The fact that Shek Kin is still madly in love with Pinky is also a sore point for Ha Kung.

However their quarrel was interrupted by several events; one where someone has been throwing acids onto the street and also a huge increase in the shop rental where few could afford it. They all rightly concluded that the unseen landlord hiked up the rental so as to force them out as the street is more lucrative now being empty than rented out as there was rumour of a rich Chinese businessman buying over popular shopping destination. They tried to find a way to solve the problem and also to find out who was throwing the acid onto the streets but in the process both Ha Kung and Shek Kin came face to face with their decades old rivalry as both their children fell for the other as the tenants find a way to preserve their beloved Sai Yeung Choi road.

Will the love of the new generation solve the rivalry of the older generation?

ENDING REVEALED
SPOILERS!! Highlight [ to ] to read the contents.

[ Quite simply, all's well that end's well (pun intended). If not what's the point of a CNY movie?


The acid thrower turns out to be the rich businessman's sexy assistant, who is the daughter of the despicable landlords in the 1970s part of the story. She wanted to avenge her father who was dragged to jail and died not much later. No news on what happened to her mother though. Ha Kung proved his love for his wife, Pinky by staying with her as he and Shek Kin tried to figure out a way to remove the strapped acid bomb on her body and they rekindled their love and patched things up. Shek Kin was able to move on and became sworn brothers with Ha Kung again and one day met with a young girl who looked like the young Pink (actually same actress that is Fala Chen). The respective children end up with the ones they fell for and the Sai Yeung Choi road was saved when the Chinese businessman was very impressed with Ha Junior, Ha Kung's son who came up with the idea of modernising Sai Yeng Choi road. Kin Chai became Ha Junior's partner in the modernisation. So the road was saved, everybody's happy and the entire movie ended with the entire cast dancing and singing, all wearing red and wishing us all a happy prosperous new year ]


Comments
Of all the CNY released movies in the cinema, this was the only one I wanted to watch, even if there was one locally produced CNY movie for a very simple reason; it has the ensemble of major and not so major, veteran and not so veteran and almost everybody from TVB that you're familiar with. In fact I did think of this movie as "Spot the TVB actor" sort of movie before I walked in, having been brainwashed by the promo shown daily on Astro Wah Lai Toi. And did spend some fun times spotting familiar faces whose name I knew and those I didn't but was glad to see them again. Of course some major names were not in here which makes me wonder could it be management's decision? Really missing are big names like Bowie Lam, Bobby Au Yeung, etc but almost all the big names of TVB are here, each starring in very small but significant roles. Like the movie tagline says, this is a movie without supporting actor because everybody has a share of the limelight. And when everybody's role is reduced to a mere 15 minutes appearance, some longer, some much lesser, suddenly I sort of appreciate their acting prowess, because 15 minutes is too short to annoy me and just enough to do what they must before we move on to the next scene.

For example, Ron Ng who spots huge glasses playing Ha Kung's shop assistant. I thought he was quite funny in a silly way as his character is quite silly. And overall he has about 15 minutes appearance and I found myself enjoying his performance. It just shows if you let the actor do what they do, let them ease up and enjoy the process, when they have fun, we the audience have fun. Then there's Charmaine Sheh with her beehive hair and her really mean landlady role. I thought she was effective too, rather bitchy and again that 15 minutes (lesser actually I think) given to her, she shone and delivered because not enough time for her to turn annoying or give a bad performance. She seems to enjoy herself in this character. Even Gordon Lam was annoying as the landlord but effectively funny. Then there's some others given more than 15 minutes but delivered the goods. Top of my memory is Wayne Lai, as the owner of a comic book shop. He delivered one of the funniest lines in this movie, the one about what he had to do to do business in this bad economic crisis, having to dress up like the comic characters and we are talking mangas here so imagine him as in Death Note, Full Metal Alchemist, etc. Very funny scene. Nancy Sit has a short memorable moment as Wayne Lai's assistant.

A special paragraph must be dedicated to Bernice Liu's performance of the tenant who sells beef ball noodle. Clearly a homage to Karen Mok's breakthrough role in Stephen Chow's classic, God Of Cookery except Bernice Liu can't act even if you give her clear instructions on what to do. First of, I commend her for bravely taking on such an ugly role, and dirty as well. If she didn't open her mouth to speak, I don't think lesser fans would be able to recognise her. I am not her fan by the way but I recognised her because every day I see her ad on TV. She is a beautiful girl with sunshine smile but in here, oh dear, really ugly and disgusting. But it was her performance that was annoying. Everytime she speaks, the other actors look at her, as if counting the minutes she will finish her lines before the next one is due to deliver theirs. She is not even funny when she is supposed to be. Her performance was the worse in here which reminds me if ever she stars in a comedy, and as a leading actress, I must avoid that series.

I must add also whilst some casting may be debatable, one was perfect casting and that was Kate Tsui as the crazy woman. She has the looks which I have been saying for a long time. Crazy eyes to full effect in here.

One guest starring I was very annoyed with was Myolie Wu, clearly as a pun to her real life relationship with Bosco. Another guest starring role which I find very very funny was the amazing and always entertaining and now really bald Dicky Cheung. His emotionless role as the bailiff was really one of the highlights, even if it was a 10 minute performance. It is not the time but the acting prowess that shows whether you can deliver or not. Michael Tse revived his most popular character, Laughing Gor but frankly I don't like Michael Tse as an actor anymore. He just annoys me. Then there was the just appear sort of role for Kevin Cheng and one other I can't remember who as firemen, clearly a reference to their popular roles as well as many others. Like I said everyone here is someone and someone from TVB, from the ke-le-fes to the supporting to the main ones.

But the full weight of the movie rested on several main characters that can be divided into the young ones and the veterans.

The young ones that is heavily featured is Wong Cho Lam as Shek Kin's son, Bosco Wong as Ha Kung's son and an actress I did not recognise, Stephy Tang as Shek Kin's daughter. Linda Chung as Ha Kung's daughter had more than 15 minutes of scene but lesser compared to the other 3. Amongst these 3, Bosco and Stephy had the most role, as the entire movie's younger generation story rested on their so called forbidden Romeo and Juliet sort of love story which was probably the movie's worst aspect. I wasn't convinced by their love nor do I care. But to give credit to Bosco, he was fun to watch and he displayed his MJ moves too even if that scene was kinda tasteless whilst Stephy was ok, can't say she was brilliant because she wasn't and can't say she was bad since she wasn't that bad. She was just the usual sort of performance but her character is scary. She likes AV movies (in Japan, AV movies is hard core porn films, though the essential parts are blurred, make no mistake, they are really doing the deed and AV movies are big stuff in Japan with the actresses earning a lot in a relatively short career - I can tell you for sure one Japanese singer that I like, Fukuyama Masaharu is a fan of of AV movies which shows very little stigma there but still shocking fact for me to digest) and is so fascinated by that sort of films she became an assistant director aiming to make her own gospel themed AV movie one day. Gospel theme AV movie! How can gospel and AV be in the same sentence?! Silly sort of ambition and her room is decorated with AV actresses' posters! Scary girl and in some ways the movie turned rather offensive at this juncture but almost and not quite offensive. Wong Cho Lam has a significant role too as the son that Shek Kin just love to scold. I find Shek Kin rather rude to this son who assists him in his business as well as other endeavours. His scenes with Linda Chung is more believable, where in one scene in an elevator, she punched him, he kissed her, rather passionately if I may add, something you will never see in TVB series. They do look like quite a pair! I must add Wong Cho Lam is very funny, delivering his lines with panache and he has excellent comic timing. In fact only he and Eric Tsang can be truly described as comedians, able to deliver the funny lines on time and effectively whilst the others were rather forced. The lines happen to be funny because the lines itself is funny.

But the main crux of the movie rested on 2 veterans; Eric Tsang and more importantly Jacky Cheung who has the most scenes and may I add, the best scenes in this movie. Their chemistry together is amazing and Jacky Cheung, apart from being a great singer is actually a very very good actor. He has comedic timing and I could hardly believe he was wearing a wig! Hair looked too real to be a wig! Both Eric and Jacky also delivered in the drama department. No denying these 2 carried this movie whilst the other appearances were of course very good bonus. I even thought Anita Yuen was kinda funny although she was better in the drama department. No denying she has acting chops but if you ask me if she was funny, no she wasn't.

Other actors stood out for various reason. For the older generation scenes I particularly enjoy Joyce Cheng having a go at her mother's role but again I stress she shouldn't have been cast in that short role. I thought she should have Linda's role because she doesn't need typecasting simply because she is her mother's daughter. I understand the decision to cast her in that role but I feel Joyce Cheng has bigger talents on her own to not just fill in the void left by her mother but she could carve her own career. Wouldn't it be nice to see her in Linda's role? Linda can have Stephy's role and Stephy can have someone else's role.

Then there was the lovely Fala Chen. I am beginning to really like her, after the dismal Moonlight Resonance where story sucked but characters and acting trimphed. She was lovely in here even if her love story was silly. Raymond Lam would become Jacky whilst the other was Justin Lo (speaking with Eric Tsang's nasal voice as well!) would become Eric. Both effective even if their story silly. I was glad Eric and Jacky quickly took over because Eric and Jacky were the main selling point when it comes to performances.

Whilst the main drawing point of this movie is the spot the actor sort of fun, I was very impressed with the fact that the dialogue was well written and very witty. Some play of words, the names of the businesses after checking out Wikipedia, such as Ting Tai Phone. That's a restaurant name! There's a Kee Wah Phone if I am not mistaken, again a bakery, very famous in Hong Kong! I also remember a scene where the camera zoomed into an eviction notice with the law firm's name printed on it. I can't really remember the name there, was it Si, Liu & Pei, Advocates & Solicitors? All are valid surnames but never quite put together in one line and when it was put together, the meaning became something else which also in short means "total and utter nonsense". I remember the name was fun play of words, very funny but frankly I am not sure if it was what I wrote in here.

There was also a rather interesting scene that if done badly would be offensive but in this movie, was really funny which was Shek Kin's new business tactic of selling handphones. Remember, he is selling phones but a customer walks in, taken to a room akin to those nightclub type, young pretty girls walk in and he can pick his salesperson who took off her top as she explains the functions of the phone. She sells the phone and gives a lifesize blow up doll with her image as free gift. And all along the disbelieving customer kept muttering "I am just buying a phone... just buying a phone". I thought that scene was hilarious, whilst tasteless but all in good fun.

And earlier one which was offensive, as Shek Kin's shop revealed 3 young scantily clad girls selling phones with heavy sexual connotations but balanced that well later with a very funny trio from Ha Kung's shop, one of whom played by Chu Mi Mi.

The ending scene was funny too, where Shek Kin and Ha Kung figured out how to dismantle the bomb on Pinky. Very very simple actually, and you have to watch it to believe it!

However there were 2 scenes I really loved that involved music. One was earlier, where the workers of both handphone shop sang to Sam Hui's classic about the workers' plight (ironically I believed it was written as a mockery to TVB back in those days!) and you see many familiar faces singing to that song whilst we see Ha Kung and Shek Kin scolding the workers as they sang and worked. The one that had me laughing the most was the hospital scene, where Wong Cho Lam and Jacky had a sing off over Jacky's classic song, the title I can't remember, was it "Loving You More Each Day"? (direct translation by the way). Anyway it started with Jacky as Shek Kin singing but then we found out it was mimed to a cd version of the song as Kin Chai that is Wong Cho Lam cooly switched off the CD player and said to his father "Dad, stop miming to Jacky Cheung's song. I can sing better, listen to the expert!" and then he sang a pitch perfect Jacky version of the song and Shek Kin then said admirably to his son "You're right! You sing better!" and if I remember correctly, Kin Chai ended the scene saying "Tell Jacky that!". Something like that. There is a dispute on whether Wong Cho Lam was mimicking Jacky or it was really Jacky singing. Wong Cho Lam isn't talking, he'd rather you speculate on whilst fans say it was Wong Cho Lam singing since he is a very good mimic and famous for it.

But let me present my theory; it was Jacky singing, Wong Cho Lam miming. Why I said that is because ...

1. When Wong Cho Lam was singing, Jacky was out of sight by the left of the screen, when he was done, Jacky walked back into the scene

2. The singing was live. I was very sure of it. So when Wong Cho Lam supposedly sang Jacky style, I find his mouth movements too over the top, it couldn't have been him singing, it looked more like miming

3. The singing was to the left of the screen. The sound source was not directly from Wong Cho Lam's direction, which was why I was sure the singing was live. My theory is the first scene, where Jacky sang it was miming to a Cd version. When it was Wong Cho Lam's turn, Jacky sang live at the side with Wong Cho Lam miming to Jacky. You can't have Jacky in a movie and not sing his own song, live.

Which is why I am sure it was Jacky singing, Wong Cho Lam miming. I am not saying Wong Cho Lam is not capable of singing well, but let's face it, Jacky is God Of Song. He can sing the phonebook and can still reign as the God of Song. I am sure of it and since Wong Cho Lam is not telling, we will never know so let's speculate on!

But whatever it may be, that scene was really funny and I love the exhange between Wong Cho Lam and Jacky.

In fact after finishing the movie I realised the selling point of this movie is the well written witty dialogue. It looked and sounded like real effort was put in, the movie is clearly a labour of love and the movie set, the recreation of Sai Yeung Choi road is not only impressive but looks real as well, although look at the floor and lightning and I am sure you will be able to see it is a movie set. But at least hundreds and hundreds of people in one scene is amazing enough for me. With well written dialogue, surely the actors would have fun delivering the lines and it shows.

I don't think I have ever been this wrong about a Chinese movie. I walked in thinking it would be the usual slapstick movie, hoping not to cringe and just enjoy "Hey! That's who and who!" but I walked out being really entertained, finding it one of those movies that balances well the dramatic moments and the comic moments with some very good performances coming from unexpected places whilst the usual ones prove us fans right. A good actor in any role is a good actor. A bad actor in a time controlled role will be an entertaining one! Of course the younger generation's love story was awful and predictable and boring but their stories didn't feature heavily in this movie. I am glad the focus was on the tenants AND on Jacky plus Eric because Eric and Jacky were the backbone of this movie. I had fun!

Verdict
You will love this movie if you are a TVB fan. Enjoy spotting your favourite actors and actresses. But more importantly, the witty dialogue and some very good performances will have you laughing hard whilst enjoying yourself. A must watch!




Share:

15 December 2009

THE STORM WARRIORS [HK][Chi]

Written by Funn Lim



"This present movie is too in awe with the technology aspect that it sacrificed the characters and the story. The story became muddled, confusing and irrelevant."








SPOILERS ... SPOILERS ... SPOILERS


Cantonese title
Fung Wan II, meaning Storm Riders 2 but like Wikipedia said, to avoid copyright problems, the directors rename it to Storm Warriors.

Released in
2009

Based on
Comic series by Ma Wing Shing

Language
Cantonese

Origin
Hong Kong

This Is
the sequel to Storm Riders

Cast-Character
Taken from IMDB.com

Aaron Kwok ... Cloud/Bou King Wan
Ekin Cheng ... Wind/Lit Fung
Kenny Ho ... Nameless/Mou Ming
Nicholas Tse ... Heart/Juet Sum (I would translate that as Hearless)
Charlene Choi ... Tai Yee Mung/Second Dream
Simon Yam ... Juet Mou San/Lord Godless
Suet Lam ... Piggy King
Patrick Tam ... Emperor
Yan Tang ... Chor Chor
Tak-bun Wong ... Lord Wicked/Che San (I would translate that as Lord Evil)
Anson Leung ... Earth
Byron Pang ... Sky

Plot
For the entire plot plus the pivotal role of Ma Wing Shing in the recasting of Ekin and Aaron in respective roles, do read Wikipedia. Exciting stuff but spoilers alert. The directors do not deserve the author I tell you.

Comments
I have summarised my feelings in my ramblings in News & Updates which I shall not repost here and although that was basically my feelings, I feel since I am not known for brevity, I must elaborate on how I felt.

First of all I do not think this is a bad movie. I rarely watch HK movies in the cinema, a treatment now exclusively for Stephen Chow movies so when Storm Warriors came out, like many others I went in to watch, despite the rather negative reviews. I was ready for the criticisms as posed in local papers' reviews and knew what to expect. Of course knowing and watching is 2 different things.

Again, this is to me not a bad movie. It is just a movie that could have been so much better. For one, the story itself is intriguing, but the screenplay was insipid. The technology is amazing, and like the comic book which I have sporadically seen years before (my brother was a big fan of such comics), the kung fu and the styles and all looked like they just walked out of the comic book, in full colour. The costumes are great, making the actors look like the characters. Some casting I would say is brilliant but many has much to be desired. So with all almost positive sort of things to say, why can't I just admit this is maybe a good movie?

Because as a viewer and somewhat a reviewer deep in my heart, even if I am not proficient in the comic series (from what I read, the story does differ greatly), I realise this movie was badly executed. There are many brilliant ideas, even if borrowed ideas or you may even say stolen ideas or perhaps the comic series may have been the originator of such ideas, whatever it may have been, the execution was poor.

Consider for one the rich material that is the comic series. Ma Wing Shing is renowned for bringing comic series into a new height where storyline plays an equal if not more important function than the stylistic drawings which were excellent if I must add. Somehow when transporting that story into the movie, the screenwriter(s) chose to strip the entire story and gave us the basic. So we have 2 plotlines; one of Lord Godless and his equally if not more conniving son, Juet Sum launching a series of deadly attacks on the world of Martial arts (mou lam) to conquer China and break the so called backbone of China (you know, the dragon's pulse or however you translate that). And the other plotline is how Fung and Wan had to resort to multiple ways to beat Lord Godless, in the process the milder heroic Fung had to demonise himself to increase his kung fu power whilst Wan, usually the more moody one in the process of stopping Fung who could no longer control himself had to decide between killing Fung or not killing Fung. If this was Wan as in the original movie, no doubt he would have killed Fung in an instance. But Wan is a changed man, still as quiet but not as stubborn or hard. I find the story of Lord Godless very interesting and whilst the movie started with Lord Godless, however about midway Lord Godless dies and for the rest of the movie we have endless and scriptless fighting between Fung and Wan just to illustrate the sacrifice of one and the other and I suspect to let the 2 leading ladies have something useful to do.

And that is the main problem with this movie.

When the story shifted to just Fung and Wan and I do really mean just them 2 for over half and hour, the entire movie's pace slackened. Although the Kung Fu became even more elaborate, somehow the entire story fell flat. I appreciate the hard work put by the 2 leading actors in the fighting scenes, and they do look credible but to just focus on fighting and throwing out the story and only to bring it back for the last 5 minutes or so just tells me the directors only seem interested in the glamour and none the substance. I want substance. Many times in the movie I just wished there was more dialogue. I just wish Wan would ask the mysterious fighter "Who the hell are you?!" or scream at Fung and say "Fung, see me! I am Wan!!" instead of leaving that to the last 10 minutes or so. Yes, there is enough intense fighting scenes to satisfy that boy in you who loved the martial arts aspect but I am sure fans of the comic series would have wished that some substance from the series would reflect on the movie screenplay itself.

And the entire concept of the movie is strange.

It started great. I mean the first 10 minutes of the movie will capture your imagination, will satisfy that fanboy in you, will make you wish if only an entire movie is made of the most interesting character that is Nameless and he appears less than I shall say 20 to 25 minutes or so. He also has the coolest fighting scene with his if I translate it correctly, 10 Thousand Sword Stance which has to be seen to be believed. I feel that 10 minutes set the pace for the movie. But then after the singing credit (awful song by the way but nice introduction), the movie just fell flat! And it became worse when Nameless disappears from the screen. Such a charismatic character played brilliantly by a charismatic actor disappears and justifiably so since he is just a guest star but yet I felt both Ekin and Aaron combined can't beat that charisma of this one actor and of one character.

This I feel is due in part to the lack of script. I am convinced Nameless has more lines than both Fung and Wan combined. Juet Sum would have the next most lines with Che Wong (as in Lord Wicked although I would translate it as Lord Evil) coming close at third. Even Patrick Tam's emperor has more lines than Wan! The entire movie is like one long music video with intense fight scenes, like a long martial arts contest. And yet at times it is so quiet that it is so unsettling. Why the lack of script?

And when there is a lack of script even at times when there are no fighting, then the actors better be really bloody good at expressing emotions without script. Problem is we all know Ekin is an iconic actor but not a fine actor. Aaron can be good and can be bad, in this movie his acting is rather like the script, sparse and not exactly good. So to fill in the gaps, we have the actors posing. Lucky for fangirls, half naked posing. Yes Aaron Kwok looks great for his age, Ekin although aged a little looks surprisingly good baring his not that flabby chest and he still looks heroic. But must we have them staring out into the sky with wind blowing on their beautiful hair and posing for that precious 10 seconds when that could be utilised to tell a story?

Even Lord Godless had so few to say. He seems to stare a lot. Again Simon Yam is not the best actor around but he is competent when he has to be. He is quite scary as Lord Godless, his ruthlessness and his steely eyes which is at most time expressionless and man, he looks great for his age. He is also very convincing in fighting scenes as in pose and move hands a lot. BUT his story arc is so underdeveloped and he is so underutilised I felt he is practically wasted in this movie. Or maybe I should reword that. He has lots of scenes but somehow his story is not properly told. It's like lots of wasted moments and I wonder what was lost and then I realised too many scenes of him and other characters looking at the other actor, looking at the sky, looking somewhere. Precious seconds wasted. It is not a tightly told story. And with that being said, Nic Tse as Juet Sum is totally wasted. Juet Sum is potentially more ruthless than his father and you can see the dissatisfaction and discord between son and father where son is ambitious and wants to be Emperor himself whilst father is of the philosophy that a kingdom can't be shared even if with his son. And yet totally wasted character who disappears almost at the end without any indication of where he is, except maybe there would be a sequal for the Juet Sum story.

Then there were the other characters. I find Che Wong very interesting because he has such an evil name but he is actually a good guy who chopped off his own hands after he was possessed by his demonic stance and killed innocent people. You see in the mou lam world, people learn kung fu to better themselves, sometimes resorting to wrong methods and often they're filled with remorse. And often these highly skilled fighters refuse to help the country to defend against foreign invasion and they are very very eccentric, like Che Wong, unlike Nameless who is very involved in the world of mou lam. And Che Wong has such a shocking appearance that I was like can't he brush his hair? Oh yeah, no hands but hey he can "throw pebbles". But I find the casting disappointing which I shall elaborate later. Anyway I find Che Wong's character perhaps the most developed quite simply because so much screentime on him.

And then there was the 2 leading ladies. One can act better than the other, but both no less annoying and so cancel out one another.

Please tell me the point of Chor Chor and Second Dream's presence? To show some love? To make us empathise with Fung and Wan? Hey I do empathise with them without annoying Chor Chor and Second Dream. In fact I was so confused. How did Wan met Chor Chor? What is the exact relationship? Because from the get go, we see Wan willingly captured by Lord Godless because Chor Chor was captured. That was what the intro said at the very beginning. Then there was Fung and Second Dream. One 10 seconds scene explained they knew each other via pen pals, never met and then met and they're already in love. Second Dream has self esteem issues as she has a scar on the I think top right of her face. She is the daughter of someone respected and is the beloved somewhat goddaughter of Che Wong. So when she suddenly appeared, it took me some time to realise she went to see Che Wong for Fung. Of course there is the issue of sacrifice and all but the point it this movie started assuming we can just presume there were relationships. But the story then became so disjointed. I thought instead of the movie starting with Nameless and his great escape and all, start with the singing and the comic sketching. And instead of sketching the characters, why not sketch what we are assumed to know? You know like Spiderman 2 I think where we are brought up to speed of Spiderman 1's plot with the intro scene in less than 3 minutes or so. It would give the director some artistic license, the graphic artistes some challenge in presenting what we should know in minutes and also benefit the fans or non-fans who has no idea how the hell Chor Chor or Second Dream feature in the story or more importantly, how the greatest fighter like Nameless and some great fighters shown in the first 10 minutes could be tricked into drinking poison and captured by Lord Godless. I was thinking how? WHO BETRAYED THEM? And who in the end saved them by giving them the antecdote?

It was as if the directors were so in awe of the technology and what they could do with it that they had simply forgotten there is one element more important than those CGI stuff; the story. Of course I can buy the idea where the sword instead of slashing someone when flung can release more swords out of thin air. This is after all a martial arts comic series. What I can't understand is how Nameless could be tricked? A bit of explanation would ease the plot a little and make it make more sense and maybe make Chor Chor and Second Dream less cardboard and more full fleshed out. And maybe throw away the emphasis on Fung becoming demon as the main plot and just concentrate on Lord Godless because I just have this feeling after a while Lord Godless serves Fung's demon story and not the other way around and that is just so boring in the end.

And the directors are much too concern with slow motion sequences, from the fighting to when Second Dream was falling and saved by Fung. The expression of Charlene Choi's face is rather comical. And I must mention that whole Dragon's Pulse in the Dragon Tomb can be more subtlely presented. Instead seriously we have the skeleton presumably the ancestor of the Emperor there and the pulse is the spine of that skeleton. When the skeleton was broken into 2 I see no consequence so what's the big deal? Maybe the sequel will explain that.

But no denying the movie is beautiful to look at even if a bit barren sometimes.

The tone of sepia and also red to connote blood and blue/green gives it a feel like it walked out of a painting. But it is obvious where te director got the inspiration. Some scenes look awfully familiar, the ones where Juet Sum launched an attack on the mou lam, that is to me 300 the movie. It is in fact 300, except less stylistic. 300 was a beautifully made movie. Then there was the black thing crawling onto Fung when he was becoming a demon as he was in the demon pond. Doesn't that look awfully familiar? Like Spiderman 3 where one of the villains got the same treatment? Even when Lord Godless was marching towards the hidden treasures of the Empire (he doesn't seem to be in such hurry I tell you!) standing on top of a huge how shall I call it? Iron cart in the shape of a lion or something? Kinda reminded me of 300 when the enemy's king was marching towards our heroes, except the villain in 300 was decked out in gold whilst Lord Godless was in heavy colourless armour. Maybe the makers of 300 were inspired by the Tin Ha series perhaps? Who knows.

But one scene which is direct rip off from another movie which had me shaking my head was the end fighting scene between Fung and Wan where they stood looking at one another, in their mind fighting in the rain or some huge drops of sweats from the looks of it, for many many many minutes. THAT is a direct rip off from Zhang Yimou's Hero. Took me quite a while to realise Aaron and Ekin are 2 singers/actors fighting whilst in Hero, it was Jet Li and Donnie Yen fighting, both martial arts champion in their own right. No need for me to say which fight was better. And the thing is Hero was infinitely better filmed in that exact same scene and the entire concept in Hero, why they fought in mind and not physically was an intriguing concept excellently executed. And beautiful too. Back to Storm Warriors, if I am not reminded of Hero, that scene was pretty good too even if way too long. But notice carefully, poor Aaron and Ekin can't lift their legs any higher! But is that necessary? Perhaps it was Zhang Yimou who was inspired by the Tin Ha series? I doubt that. Although in that same scene, Storm Warriors had more special effects whilst in Hero, it was really man to man fight filmed in one long sequence.

But like I said, it is not necessarily a bad movie.

The performance(s) however is like the difference between day and night.

As mentioned above, Ekin Cheng despite looking a bit older and isn't a great actor to begin with still has that heroic iconic look. He serves his character well and I thought he did look convincing as the demon since he is pretty expressionless. You can see he worked very hard for those intense scenes so I appreciate that.

Aaron Kwok is moody, moody, moody all throughout the film, with very very very little to say. That man never ages and he looks great but like Ekin, he is pretty stiff in his performance. But he has more role than Ekin actually. His Wan has very important role to play at the end and fear not, I believe his end is a positive thing, meaning even if there won't be a 3rd part in movie, in comic world, Wan's ending can't be that depressing. I feel he serves his purpose well.

Kenny Ho shocked me. I haven't seen him for years, always remembering him as Chung Wa Ying Hung, not Ekin. Kenny Ho's only weakness is his kinda like pinch the nose sort of voice but he delivered his lines with authority and a certain sense of foreboding. But it was his looks. This man never ever ages! He looked very good, and heroic too. Like Ekin, he has a naturally iconic good guy heroic sort of look and to me he is perfectly cast as Nameless. Love the costume, love the hair, love his performance. He is convincing and he looks great also. I also find it rather funny that when Nameless said he had only 10% of power left, he could still beat the rest of the lot. Oh how I wish a movie is made of him having 100% power!! If there is a reason why this movie rocks, I will make it plainly clear; Kenny Ho. That's it.

Simon Yam is competent even if underused and then discarded like he was nothing. I felt his Lord Godless was interesting although at times he does look expressionless. Like I said, he is not a great actor but again serves his purpose well. Anyway I didn't even know Lord Godless is supposed to be Japanese until I saw the intro.

You may not like Nicholas Tse's performance as Juet Sum but I feel that is due more to the script rather than Nicholas Tse. I tell you he has perfected the "I wanna slap this face" look. That arrogance, that cruelty, that hidden evil, that dissatisfaction, you can see it all in his precious minutes of performance. Clearly his performance lives up to the name Juet Sum. What a pity his character was not properly developed.

Wong Tak Bun as Che Wong is a miscast. First of, yes he has the body, the height and even the depressing looks but to me he can stand there and yet not have an iota of heroicness, like Chinese say, "Yat Toi Jung See" or Master of Masters sort of look. I always thought he was boring. I was quite shocked he was given such a prominent role. In fact I thought I saw Joe Ma in the starting scene, one of the masters who sacrificed themselves to save Nameless and gang.

The best actor however goes to Patrick Tam. He is the emperor, not even robed and looked messy and yet there is a certain kingliness to him, an authority. That scene where Juet Sum held his family ransom, killing the wife and threatened to kill the son unless the secret of the treasure is revealed, that desperation in his eyes, his pain, all in that 5 minutes performance or less beat the rest of the cast in this movie. Give this man a Best Supporting Actor award! And check out that scene with Aaron's Wan, how he was reluctant to beg but had to go down on his knees but stopped by Wan. That pride! And also that scene where his men (soldiers) turned their backs against Lord Godless and how he understood the difficulties faced by then. In fact I just described the entire appearance by Patrick Tam! Other than Nameless as an iconic character and coolest performance, in retrospect Patrick Tam gave this movie the acting chops.

The same can't be said of the rest of the main players.

Tang Yan as Chor Chor. I was reading another review posted at SPCNET and this is apparently the character played originally by Shu Qi. No wonder the hair looks quite the same. Again if we are reminded of that in the first 10 minutes song sequence, there wouldn't be much confusion! Anyway between the 2 as in Charlene Choi or even Shu Qi, I find her performance tolerable even if her dubbed voice is annoying. However since I do not know where her character suddenly comes from, I find her Chor Chor annoying even if her ending shocking. As for the love connection, there isn't any. Just to give Aaron some excuse to give more than one dimensional performance as Wan.

Charlene Choi as I have mentioned many times before is god awful. Make that universally god awful. I must admit she looked pretty since she seems caked in 10 layers of powder thus making her look very pretty with flawless complexion which I am sure she has. Her costume, hair, make up all perfect. BUT her performance is not. First of her voice is annoying. The way she delivered her lines with concern sounded fake. I was hoping she would be the one running in between Fung and Wan as they fought but apparently her Second Dream is not that giving a person. And her name is silly but that is the author's fault. I was irritated that she showed no expression when poor Chor Chor met with such an ending. In fact she showed no expression throughout. Her casting is probably to attract her fanbase because quite frankly I can see no other reason. I did ask in my original post whether when she looked at herself on the screen magnified ten fold whether she asked herself did she do a good job and whether she realised she was god awful? I also mentioned she was also a waste of oxygen in the movie and I stand by that. Why this movie sucks is because of her although she is not the only reason but she is one of the bigger reason. Can someone just tell Miss Choi either she buck up, go take speech lesson and learn to move her face since she can't be that old to have been injected with botox which freezes her face to the point she can't express concern, happiness, fear, pain, etc? Please?

Everybody else pretty standard, no one stood out even if there were a few more annoying ones.

Verdict
In retrospect, Storm Riders was a better movie where technology and CGI serves the story and not the other way around. This present movie is too in awe with the technology aspect that it sacrificed the characters and the story. The story became muddled, confusing and irrelevant. Performance wise, a few notable ones I have named above but generally the performances were less than satisfactory, some caused by the actors themselves but some by the lack of a steady consistent good script. I think in the end when you stopped being in awe of the beautiful aspect of the movie you will realise just maybe it is a bad movie in that sense. You may say the directors did a credible job bringing the vision to life but to me the story is more important and that the directors failed miserably. If you need any reason to watch this movie, which I doubt you do since you will run to the cinema for it, watch it for Kenny Ho's Nameless. I don't think there has been any character than leave such an impact in a movie by doing so little. Well actually he did a lot but you know what I mean. Like I said the 1st 10 minutes itself is worth half the price of the admission ticket but in the end the rest of the sporadically exciting but mostly dull movie cancel the other half of that worthiness.

Best Scene
Kenny Ho looks fantastic! May I repeat brilliant casting!

 

Interesting Prop
The fans. I mean the hair blowing all the time, so beautifully thanks to the fans. I have a feeling many may have been replaced because burnt out for overuse! And hair extensions as well.

Interesting Artwork
You can't fault the artwork which I suspect the author may had something to do with it! Gorgeous renderings of the characters, teaser posters, etc. Check out the official website for more. Love the official site! Must check out the comic artwork section!!

The teaser posters and official posters



The Artwork of the characters







free counter

free hit counter
Share:

Labels, Archive and the usual sidebar contents are at the bottom of this page.