Latest Posts
One moment pls. Loading 10 latest posts...

28 December 2007

C.I.B FILES [TVB]

Written by Funn Lim

"In fact I find Bowie the actor rather sexy in here and that is rare; in HKTVB there is no sexy. There is mature handsome, playful handsome, irritating handsome but sexy? Not quite and here he was, to me very sexy."


Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

SPOILERS ... SPOILERS ... SPOILERS



Released In
2006

Chinese title
Ying Si Ching Bo For

Which I suppose translates to Serious Crime Investigation Bureau but then the English title says it better, Criminal Investigaton Bureau Files.

No. Of Episodes
20

Cast-Character
Took the following from Dramawiki and assuming they're correct, my review will be based on the names below.

Bowie Lam as Tony Chung Shun
Christine Ng as Emily Ching Mei Lai
Wong Hei as Mark Chung Jing
Maggie Siu as Samantha Hui Sum Yin
Wai Ka Hung as Daniel Kwok
Kenny Wong as William Hung
Chan Hung Lit as Albert Chung
Chow Ka Yee as May Ching
Lok Ying Kwan as Yip Sir
Yu Yeung as Jimmy Chan
Joe Jr as Mo Sir
Queenie Chu Wai Man as Rachel Yu
Joey Chan Jou Yee as Michael Chung
Rachel Kan Muk Wah as Joey
Gregory Charles Rivers as Kim
Ellesmere Choi as Chiu Wei Lun
Annabelle Lau as Elaine
Patricia Liu as Vivian

Plot Summary
A story about 2 dedicated policemen in the CIB unit, 2 dedicated reporter for some sleazy magazine, their love lives, their family and about everyone else in CIB and in the magazine company. In short this is a series about everyone and everybody. Confused? So was I, at first. More in Comments.

Plot
Complete spoilers so avoid if you must.

Tony and Mark are brothers who are both policemen. From the beginning we know Tony as a stable mature cool hea dof his unit in CIB, married quite young to Emily, an ambitious chief editor of a sleazy tell all magazine which seems to be the reference book for those in CIB. They have a 15 year old son named Michael and family life is loving if a bit forced due to the nature of their work. Mark was an undercover police for several years and recently got transferred to CIB under a female head of his unit, Vivian. Mark works together with 2 colleagues, Daniel and one other whose name I forgotten. Mark was seeing an insurance agent until he was dumped in a rather humiliating fashion, when he bumped into her leaving a motel with her boyfriend. Mark and Tony has a close relationship due to the fact that their father, Albert left them and their mother many years before for another woman. Tony and Mark never forgave their father, and their mother died a bitter woman. For many years Mark looks up to Tony as a father figure whose opinion he respected and Tony felt much guilt that Mark was the son who was left to take care of their bitter mother when Tony left the country to further his police training. Their relationship is as cordial as it is close and Mark gets along very well with Emily, his sister in law.

On the other hand, Samantha is an over ambitious and sometimes ruthless female reporter who was employed by Jimmy, Emily's boss. Emily saw this as a challenge to her authority as chief editor and from the moment Samantha stepped into the office, both had silently declared war against another. Each is assisted ably by equally as nosy and ruthless young assistant, Emily by her own younger sister, May whilst Samantha is assisted by her long time assistant, Joey.

Whilst the men at CIB seems to get on exceptionally well, the women at the magazine escalated from wanting to overthrow one another to full on war, especially when Samantha was investigating the story of an undercover cop, Mark and Emily is pressured to obtain more information about certain high profile cases eventhough she has never considered betraying her husband.

Whilst Mark seems to get into the bad books of Samantha who feels he is trying to annoy her for having investigated and made several allegations about him, Mark is actually a good natured man whose only weakness seems to be the fact that he is an overly law abiding citizen. Samantha gets annoyed everytime she sees him, more so when he stumbled upon again and again on her senile mother.

And then Mark and Tony's father came back into their lives. They found out that the other woman died some time ago, their father's house burnt down, I think in China and he was suffering from cancer. Tony thought Mark would not be able to forgive their father, Albert for what he did before since Mark was the one who took care of their mother whilst Tony was overseas but as it turns out, Mark when he heard his father was sick, homeless and alone, took his father home, much to the chagrin of Tony whom he himself realised he was not as forgiving as Mark. Albert wanted desperately to regain his sons' love, especially the more resentful and much older Tony and so he tried his smiling best to get into the good books of Tony who made his displeasure known earlier on. Things changed a little when Tony suffered from some sickness that had him blinded for several days as his father secretly visited him. With the advise of his mentor and good friend Yip Sir as well as Mark and especially Emily, Tony began to soften a little towards his father but still resentful everytime he remembered how he had abandoned them and their mother.

As investigations went on and on and as the magazine began to reveal more and more exclusives, the personal lives of these good people began to unravel. Emily overheard Tony's doubts of her innocence over certain confidential information that was leaked out, thinking perhaps she was the one who leaked the information and Emily was so disappointed, she could not forgive Tony, eventhough he had tried to apologise. Their relationship which was already very cordial before, filled with pretense and lies was now exploding due to the lack of communication which in the end became total breakdown of communication. Taking Michael to study overseas, Emily had time to reflect on her life and although she did not regret having Michael and delaying her career earlier on, she now had some tinge of regret that whatever she had done did not in the end earn his complete trust. It became worse when she suspected he was having affairs and he was accused of having slept with one of the informers. She felt resentful at his distrust so much so she began to retreat away and the marriage began to crumble to the point that Tony didn't know what else to do than to wait for Emily to calm down and he moved out of the apartment. Emily threw herself into her work and did many unscrupulous things to secure her position, and she became more vindictive when she found out that Mark was dating Samantha.

Back to Samantha.

Samantha had a sad past and Mark did not know her past before until his own father played matchmaker and asked Mark to help fix her broken down laptop. Mark gave it to Daniel who himself looked into the contents of the laptop and revealed to Mark that Samantha had 3 fiancees and all of whom had died. She was considered bad luck but that didn't stop Mark from falling for Samantha. She wouldn't have given him another look if not for one bad move masterminded by Emily that almost caused her her job. Samantha became disillussioned and then she bumped into Mark. With Mark she began to relax and began to change her pace. She became less ambitious and began to make an effort to be Emily's friend as she realised their rivalry was too destructive for everyone they both knew. But Emily misinterpreted Samantha's good intentions and when she found out Mark and Samantha was dating, in front of a very upset Samantha Emily told Mark about how bad Samantha is for him and how he should avoid her as she is only using Mark. Mark thanked Emily for her concern but reiterated that Samantha was good for him. Samantha was touched but felt guilty when Emily and Tony seperated. She felt it was she who drove Emily to being more ruthless and when Mark suggested she meets Tony as a formal introduction, Samantha was nervous as she was afraid Tony might feel Samantha was the cause of the breakdown of the marriage. Tony made sure Samantha did not feel that way anymore and accepted Samantha as part of the family because Tony knew the breakdown occured long before Samantha appeared.

All was happy, and Samantha steadily retreated from her demanding job whilst Emily went full speed ahead. She was all along Jimmy's pimp of sort, breaking off his women for him and etc. She can be manipulative and demanding as well as bitchy but why she wanted to destroy Samantha, which was overheard by Tony who rebuked her was because she genuinely thought Samantha was using Mark.

One day Samantha was waiting with Mark's family for his arrival for some dinner I think when they got hold of the news that Mark was shot. He survived but Samantha became very afraid that she may be the cause since she was bad luck. She tried to ignore it, eventhough her own mother in law (played by Suet Lei) kept begging her to leave Mark if not she will cause his death. She happily ran towards the hospital to see Mark when she heard the news that the hospital's power went off completely. Samantha was convinced she will kill Mark in the end if she continued to be with him and so she decided to leave him for good. Mark refused her reasons but she made up her mind. At that point Jimmy asked Samantha for some exclusive pictures of Mark since Mark was mysteriously shot after another policeman was also shot. Nobody knew who did it. She was offered the job she wanted and Emily was convinced Samantha would say yes but to her surprise Samantha said no. In fact Samantha wanted to quit. Emily's perception of Samantha changed and realised Samantha's love for Mark was genuine and Emily began to see Samantha in a new light. They ended up being friends and although Emily tried to persuade Samantha to give Mark a chance, Samantha decided that he was better off without her. This prompted Mark to break the rules and to use all his power to find what happened to one of Samantha's suppossedly dead fiancee when I think it was Daniel who told him he saw Samantha's fiancee in a picture taken from Thailand in one of the files.

Meanwhile Emily began to soften towards Tony and wanted to reconcile and yet found herself unable to tell him. Tony began to realise he hardly knew his wife and his taste and began to retreat a little eventhough he was waiting for the day Emily would be back with him. They were not talking, and then they found out Michael was suffering from depression and was sent home early to recuperate. To their shock Michael became a rude obnoxious boy and for his sake they pretended to be back together again and lived under one roof. In actual fact Michael pretended to change which is the plan of Albert in trying to bring them back together again. The plan didn't work and Michael became very frustrated and left for his school whilst Emily and Tony spiralled towards the inevitable, divorce. But neither could suggest it.

At the same time Jimmy was going through a potentially expensive divorce. He knew Emily knew a lot of his secrets whilst his wife tried to get Emily to be on her side. Emily didn't want to be involved and Jimmy instigated Tony to find a divorce lawyer as Emily was the one who told Jimmy to tell Tony. Since Tony and Emily were not talking to one another, each made a wrong assumption that the other wanted to divorce. They ended up signing the seperation papers and took off their wedding bands. But Albert gave one last try to get them to talk but that didn't work. Tony called Emily and finally confessed his feelings but Emily did not hear him because she was busy trying to look for the wedding ring that fell to the floor. In the end Tony thought Emily did not want to be with him again and left it at that.

Meanwhile Mark found out that I think Samantha's 3rd husband did not die. He had in fact ran off to Thailand to avoid loan sharks and had married in Thailand. Samantha went to see him. And then I think her 2nd husband, Ah Lun came back and he too didn't die. He ran away because he got cold feet before the wedding. His mother, the senile one could not forgive him and whilst he wanted to reconcile with Samantha, the guys as CIB was beginning to suspect that he was the one who shot Mark. Even Samantha thought he was the one and followed him to Mark's house, and in the house she heard Albert scream and when Lun came out she hit him hard on the head. As it turns out, Lun wanted to see Mark to ask him to give Samantha a chance since she can't forget him and that he and Samantha was over.

It was not until the very end did the shooter of Mark was revealed and Mark was once again in peril but Mark was so frustrated that she challenged that man by putting his forehead against the gun and it was William who shot that man to death that saved the day.

The last scene was Emily in the office alone when she was stunned by I think a stungun and it was one of Jimmy's mistresses who was insane. The next scene we see all of them at some funeral but Emily didn't die. In fact she was hospitalised and in that few days of rest she and Tony talked more than they ever did all those years and each began to find out each dislikes and likes and life begins anew for them.

As for Mark and Samantha, the last scene we see was Samantha was driving by when she saw Mark parked by the side, sleeping. It was the same scenario that she was in some time ago where it was Samantha parked by the side and Mark ended up fixing her license plate, cleaning the car window and even sat in his car watching over her as she slept soundly, woken only by the sound of her handphone ringing and he immediately hid himself and she left. In this last scene, it was Samantha who cleaned the windows, stopped the patrol police from waking him up and when he woke up to the sound of his handphone ringing, she hid. But he knew she was there and as they playfully teased each other, we the viewers found out they too began a new and the scene with them ended with Mark rubbing his nose lightly over Samantha's nose followed by a light loving kiss.

The end.

Comments
It took me about 18 episodes to realise what Tony and Mark do for their job and what is CIB about. As TVB would explain it, CIB officers do not hold guns. They're more of the analytical field, compiling statistics and information provided by their informers who are on their payrolls as well as taking care of undercover cops. But in TVB's interpretation of CIB's work, they first have meetings with the entire department. Then they have meetings with their own teams to which their own team members would have meetings amongst themselves and after work they will have private meetings in a pub to talk abou life and of course work. They're professionally clad in beautifully cut suits with sometimes over the top hairstyle and they spend their times glued to their sits, holding a pen and starts sprouting statistics and strategy. They are not involved in arresting people, rather that's the job of O-kei, in this series represented by robots who either has no emotion or has too much angst in the form of the guys in OCTB, forever clad in blue jackets, blue hat, marches instead of walk and will always breakdown a door by first doing a roll over the floor and then promptly kicked down the entire door. If OCTB is supposed to be a joke, let me stress that yes I get it. I do. In fact the men at OCTB is really the main cause of this series' failure of there was one because they're a joke by themselves. They actually march instead of walk and I don't think I have ever seen them smile, even once.

The series itself is full of in jokes. I read there are quite a few but in the 1st episode itself, you will see a direct rip off from Infernal Affairs. I thought that was funny and I thought the tone of this series would be comedy but then it became very very serious that somehow all these in jokes just didn't seem appropriate.

It is also interesting to note that the men in the police force get on incredibly well, especially in the form of Daniel and his partner as well as Tony and everyone else but it was the two female reporters and their assistants that provide the catfights, rivalry and declaration of intention to destroy one another. The rivalry of Emily and Samantha in fact dominated the first half of this series as they went on and on to kill each other off. The love relationship seems pretty set. For a moment there would be affaird between Patricia Liu's character and Bowie's character since everytime he sees her, cue the music that had me interpreting it as in the mood for love but they ended up being just really friendly and encouraging colleagues. In fact Patricia's character left halfway to care for her sick daughter and reconcile with her husband, not seen in the series. So I was wondering if the relationships are pretty set then what is the story about?

The truth is there is none. This is that kind of series that I could not predict the storyline because there is nothing fixed. The identity of Mark's shooter had me guessing till the very end, thanks in some part to Daniel's wrong accusations of everybody who appears in this series. In fact by the time the shooter was revealed I have pretty much exhausted the suspect list and I still didn't get it right. So I count the mystery of the shooter in this series a success and in the end the shooter who was revealed seems quite suitable. He had reasons to hate Mark.

Everytime I got this series figured out, it went the other way. A big part of the romance or the reluctance of romance is on the part of Samantha and Mark. They're the on and off again element of this series and is of course strangely watcheable for a very good reason.

Have you seen Maggie Siu and Wong He individually? Does it ever strike you that they're even remotely compatible? But yet when put together, their intensity for one another is very obvious and the way Wong He looked at Maggie and the way Maggie stared at Wong He, I find them having an abundance of chemistry. The last scene was especially effective because I have never seen such a seductive and loving scene between a couple that didn't have some form of some action on bed. They were fully clothed, standing and yet the way they looked at one another, the way he lightly brushed his nose against hers and then a light kiss with a hug was more intimate than any Hollywood sex scene I have ever seen. Who needs Lust Caution when such simple loving gestures describe it all? I was especially struck by Maggie's performance in that scene as she looked at a sleeping Wong He and she just stared, with a little smile and you knew this woman's heart is his to keep. Likewise earlier on, Wong He stared at a sleeping Maggie and you knew this man was falling for her despite the fact that she was quite rude to him. Something about her that made him look at her and something about him that made her stop and reevaluate her life. I find their love relationship totally convincing and beautiful, even if it was momentarily and almost destroyed by that silly bad luck thing plot. What's the direct translation for "Tong Zhu Tang"? The chinese language can be very articulate.

The same can't be said for Bowie and Christine. Individually they look good.

Bowie looks handsome in a very masculine yet educated yet authoritative yet mature way. I am in a dilemma because I can't admit it since I never quite felt that way that I do about TVB male actors except for one or two. I mean Kevin Cheng has my vote as the handsomest and most debonair looking actor in TVB. Alex Fong Chung Shun, when he doesn't talk simply looks ravishing and very handsome as well. Raymond Lam is handsome of course but like a young man way. The rest are just too kiddie for me to feel any way remotely attracted to them. Bowie too. I mean in Dance Of Passion I find his performance totally lacking in everything and he simply looked like a brute. In fact in most series he looks like a brute. His small eyes, forever thinning hair ... he and Wong Hei do look like brothers. Whilst Wong He as Mark is clearly the younger and more playful one, Bowie's Tony hardly do any running or anything physical. His actions in this series reminds me of the 1st half of Jewel In The Palace where the characters walk from point A to point B, sit and talk. In fact he sat a lot in this series. And he was forever clad in well cut suit. Oh my the suits... they deserve a name for themselves, because they're a character in themselves. Anyway Bowie...never in jeans and T-shirt from what I remember, maybe a pyjamas but always, always in a suit. Some may disagree with me but I will admit it here; when Bowie first appeared in this series, as a mature man with a wife and a teenage son and in a highly paid job (look at his apartment! look at his car! look at his suits!) and well respected, I kinda forgot he was a policeman. He seems more like a corporate CEO. Anyway I looked at him and I felt.. immensely attracted to his Tony, even when his Tony never quite could reveal his feelings for his wife, Emily. Throughout this series Tony has been true to his wife; he never cheated. Of course he suspected her but he apologised, he gave her room to think about their relationship. For a man in such a high powered job, he was not pushy at all; in fact you can say he is a bit soft but then he loved his wife, he didn't want to push her. Just like Mark when he was dealing with Samantha and her insecurities. I find all these traits very appealing and I found myself very attracted to Bowie's Tony. In fact I find Bowie the actor rather sexy in here and that is rare; in HKTVB there is no sexy. There is mature handsome, playful handsome, irritating handsome but sexy? Not quite and here he was, to me very sexy. I just don't know why I felt that way. I told my sis, "Eh Bowie very sexy lar" and she concurred. I guess this has to do with my age, my perception and the fact that pretty boys charms me but mature stable somewhat good looking man (ok he's not handsome but he's not THAT ugly) attracts me. He looks like a man who can take care of his woman and for that I feel Bowie was well cast. Perfectly cast? I don't know but definitely well cast. Performance wise, ok at times he seems breathless but that is his habit. Bowie has been forever like that like forever. There was a time Bobby Au Yeung is the quittensential professional mature man, with some annoying traits but now Bowie can be that too. Not just by profession but by demeanour. And he hardly changed his acting style at all.

Christine on the other hand had the more severe look. Her hair is black, in fact very black and cut with such severe cut that she looks harsh and cold. In the beginning her Emily seems like 2 woman in one; the cold calculative manipulative ambitious devious Emily at work and the loving, understanding, warm Emily at home. But we know she is a little bit of both. Somewhere along the way she must have realised she may have made a rash decision in marrying Tony. She said she didn't regret marrying him or having Michael or even taking time off to take care of the family but I think somewhere along the way she felt she may have given up a little too much. She changed for the worse; she pushed Tony away and said things like "Don't you understand? I don't feel that way about us anymore. You feel that way, but I don't. Not anymore." Quite obvious isn't it? And Tony slipped away to give her time and the more time he gave her the more she changed. She became more career minded. She was already ambitious but she never quite take the work back home. Now she worked all day in the office perhaps to catch up the old times. She was bent on destroying Samantha, she was ruthless to the point Tony had to ask her "Why are you so bent on destroying her? Shouldn't you give people a chance?" which of course she retorted to get out of her face. She was rude but not in an impolite manner. She began to talk less with Tony and already the relationship wasn't a very communicative one. They hid secrets from one another and that perhaps made Emily feel that this marriage was not right to begin with. She went as far as to insult Samantha in front of Mark who quietly accepted her comments and rebuked her in a very polite way. I have a feeling Emily must have married very young, perhaps was pregnant when she married Tony and supported his career all these years as she languished away. Then she started working again and by the time the marriage broke down, she may have felt she should have done this earlier. As she married young, she also spoke in one scene about her duties as an older sister, taking care of her younger siblings and in some way since Mark is so close to her, she must have cared for him too. All these feelings of resentment of marrying young and felt that she has given up too much too soon boiled and overflowed; and Samantha bore the brunt of her dissatisfaction with her own life and her past decisions.

And yet one very telling scene which I felt was very powerful was when Emily earlier on brag about her life to Samantha; "I am a happily married woman with a great career, a boss that trusts me, a husband that loves me and a son that adores me. You? What are you?". It was vindictive and malicious and Samantha felt the daggers in the statement because it was true; Samantha had 3 dead fiancees, 3 mother in laws and no one else. So later into the series when Emily began pushing Tony away, her statement rang even clearer; why can't Emily see how lucky she was?

To me Emily was one chameleon like character which perhaps did not have the most drastic change but perhaps the most significant change. In the end when she realised she really didn't want to divorce, she couldn't get herself to confess that to Tony. Neither could Tony but at least he did during a telephone call but she didn't hear him. From secretly highly ambitious to all out super ambitious, in the end Emily transformed into less career minded and the last scene was her considering the role of a housewife because she realised nothing is more important than family. Tony softly rebutted her saying "As I have said before, I have never stopped you from pursuing your career" which is true. He is a very understanding husband, she was a very understanding wife, they're very loving parents but the problem is they never quite tell that to each other. This series is like a look into a seemingly perfect relationship which deep down is a troubled one.

Halfway through Emily was difficult to watch. She was bitchy to the max but there was a redeeming quality. She meant what she said; family is always first. Even when she had an opportunity to advance her career at the price of betraying her husband and family, she never did. In fact she mistakenly thought Samantha was using Mark to advance her career but when she found out that wasn't the truth, she not only saved Samantha's job, in the end they became friends. All those rivalry stemmed from a misunderstanding; that she thought Samantha was ruthless and would hurt Mark and Samantha simply hit back to save herself since she is more of a survivor. When that wasn't the case, Emily actually said good things about her when her own sister insulted Samantha. Likewise Samantha refused to betray Mark and Emily too and so she quit and joined a broadcast company as a TV reporter. In a way Mark and Tony are two very lucky men; they have very loyal women.

But why then did the marriage broken down? This series tackles this question. It is interesting because Emily and Tony did not seperate because of another woman, neither was Tony a bad husband or Emily a negligent wife, both are loving capable parents and both did not have any vice that drove the other out. In fact one of the best scene had Emily shopping with Jimmy's wife, Elaine. Elaine was hoping to get Emily on her side to reveal Jimmy's many affairs but Emily refused, saying "Even if I were to be your witness, imagine how ridiculous that would be for you since I would be a divorced woman and I would be attacked as a woman who hates man so my credibility would be gone". Which is what Jimmy was planning when he deliberately caused a rift between Emily and Tony. Jimmy was Emily's mentor, Elaine her classmate so they were pretty close. But Elaine replied "But you and Tony are different. You didn't break up because of some other woman or man, you didn't fight, it wasn't about money.. in fact your separation with Tony is so amicable I envy you! I wish all divorces can be like you and Tony, without fuss, without reason, just good clean break" and Emily looked like she was wondering too "Yeah lor, why then Tony and I separated??". I wonder too.

I find that aspect of this series, especially Emily's evolution from episode 1 until the last very interesting to watch. I am a sucker for study on human behaviour and to me this series provides that aspect adequately. Unfortunately I just don't quite see the chemistry between Bowie and Christine and I suppose that is deliberate.

Likewise on the part of Samantha, she too is an interesting character by herself. She was highly ambitious and probably a survivor since she survived the deaths of 3 fiancees and a very vindictive mother in law (of first fiancee) who would always say negative things like "I beg you to leave Mark! You know who you are! You are a bad luck, you will kill him like you killed 3 others. Leave him for his own good! It isn't that difficult to live a life without men". She quietly accepted those mean words perhaps she felt they were true. Anyway before Mark she threw herself at her work. One plot to overthrow her by Emily, she mellowed down tremendously. In fact she slowed down and went hiking, lunches with Mark to the point she fell for him. Again you can see the change in this woman. Not a drastic change but a very significant change.

Both these women changed from highly ambitious to in the end realising that perhaps they have got their priorities wrong. Maybe you will disagree with this perspective in life, I too in some aspect but this series presents this aspect in perspective in a very subtle way, represented by Emily and Samantha.

As for the men, Mark and Tony hardly changed throughout. In fact they were pretty consistent.

There are other characters too that illustrate this perspective issue.

For example, Patricia Liu's Vivian. Little is know about Vivian except for one telling scene where she was having wine with Tony with that "let's be lovers" type of song (bad choice if you ask me because they were never lovers) blasting away and in that one scene we found out she was married, in the midst of separation, had a daughter, daughter was very sick, she had to take long leave to take care of daughter, daughter cured when mom and dad got back together, realised in her attempts to leave her husband that she may have acted rashly and ended up back with her husband for a second shot at the marriage and was leaving the job to be a housewife. Again you may feel perhaps this woman is sacrificing her career which was unnecessary but this series again presents the debate on perspective; you know which priority is your most important one and you should strive for that. I always thought Vivian would end up being Tony's lover and Tony would leave her to go back to Emily but this series really surprised me in that aspect; it wasn't that simple nor was it that dramatic.

In fact nothing really dramatic ever happens. Even the cases investigated by CIB are forgettable. Towards the middle suddenly CIB officers stop investigating but they still have meetings. The series went full speed ahead with the relationship issues. Not just on love...

Friendship amongst colleagues get a big boost in this series. Of course it is cliche, I was always and still is complaining why colleagues are such best friends in TVB world. But this series takes it one step up; it actually preaches it. When Samantha was with Mark and Mark apologised for being late since he had to fetch a colleague back home as he or she was sick or something, Samantha looked surprised at Mark's closeness to his colleagues. Mark said "Well shouldn't colleagues be as such? Helping each other?" and Samantha must have thought about her relationship with Emily and she sighed "Perhaps it should be". We also see a lot of scenes between Tony and Yip Sir. I suspect Yip Sir was Tony's mentor but Tony, has he had more education and more merits actually climbed the ladder faster and became Yip Sir's superior. And yet there wasn't any rivalry at all. Yip Sir was Tony's advisor and when Tony looked like he didn't want to accept Yip Sir's advise, Yip Sir tersely said "I know you don't want to listen to what I have just said but I have known you for so long, I feel those words must be said". The level of their friendship and trust in one another extends beyond being colleagues and often times Yip Sir was very honest with Tony. Again isn't that what friendship means? A friend should be one who say things you want to hear and things you don't want to hear. If a friend can't be that honest for your own good and your family can't be that honest as well, who can? I find Yip Sir to be a very level headed man. Then there's Mark and his colleagues turn subordinates, Daniel and the other guy whose name I forgotten. Daniel may have tried too hard to please Mark but I do believe on some levels he did it with good intentions. Daniel believes colleagues should be friends first and foremost, more so when a policeman depends on the other for cover. But Daniel can be over the top and very intrusive to the point Mark blew his top and shouted "Stop meddling in my private matters! Why not like this? We are colleagues and nothing more!" and Daniel was very hurt. Later Mark calmed down and softly said to Daniel "I am sorry for being terse with you. Although we are colleagues, are friends foremost". Even the relationship between Emily, Tony and their son Michael is more like friends than parents. Michael can tell his parents everything and Tony and Emily could tell Michael everything. Which is funny that Tony and Emily can't tell each other that. One very good scene which I thought at first was weird since no parent can be so open with his or her children had Tony messaging Michael via computer. At the same time Emily was doing the same. Each parent confessed to Michael the marital troubles but assured Michael everything was fine whilst Michael tried to persuade both. Then Emily wrote "Having been away from your father for some time during the trip to England (I think it was England, but can't be sure where's the sun studying), I remember the trip very well. I remember having to go sight seeing alone and for once I felt free. I didn't miss your father, I was alone and I felt happy". Immediatly there was a call and Tony called Emily to take the call as Michael was calling them and when Emily took the call, it became a 3 way call and it was Michael scolding Emily saying "Mother, how could you say that! How could you say you feel happy without me and father by your side! Father loves you! I love you! How can you feel complete without us?" Tony looked at Emily sheepishly, Emily said to Michael sheepishly "I didn't mean that. I just meant what I felt at that moment that's all. It doesn't mean anything". But actually it did.

And then there was the relationship between a parent and a child. The siblings in here are close but the parents are not. For me the best scene or scenes in this series was between Albert the father and Tony which can be emotional. Tony overheard Albert said to one of Samantha's mother in law "In all my life I have but one regret; I have failed this woman that I loved and I have never given her true happiness and until the day she died she never felt happy. I have failed her and nothing I could do could ever make it up to her". Tony thought he was talking about his mother so when he was very friendly with Albert and he said "I never knew you felt that way about mother" and repeated what he overheard, Albert was in a dilemma. He confessed; "I wasn't referring to your mother. I know I have failed you, Mark and your mother for leaving and being with this woman. The truth is I have perhaps met her at a wrong time but I couldn't ignore my feelings. However I felt I have failed her, not your mother. At least your mother could die cursing me, at least she had a venue to express her hatred for what I did, but this woman, although she was with me, she never felt happy. She felt guilty and until the day she died she never forgave herself for what she did to your mother. It is because of her I feel most guilty. She had no where to vent her pain and so she suffered in silence". Tony listened. The next morning Mark saw Albert who said "I think I may have to move out" and Mark asked "Why?" and Albert said "I don't think your brother would want me here anymore". Mark was confused but Tony walked out, hardly smiling and Albert looked at him nervously and then Tony gently fixed Albert's tie and chatted lightheartedly. Albert smiled a smile of relief whilst Mark asked "Can somebody tell me what's going on here?". Quite a funny scene and touching as well. I find the dialogue here very effective and very poignant although Chan Hung Lit was very difficult to understand.

The mood of certain key scenes was helped by the fantastic music with the appropriate ha-ha-ahhhhhhhhs inserted certain scene or some songs except for that "let's be lovers" music that appears whenever we see Vivian and Tony together. The themesong however was horrible and horribly sung by who else but Bowie Lam. I thought good, now we have Wong He screeching away for the end song and to my great surprise, the end song was always an English song. Luther Vandross or Craig David? The song is familiar, very recent but can't remember the singer.

The camera work also helped. You will see probably TVB's most inventive camera work in the 1st episode, and towards the end it became standard camera work but changes are good, very good. In fact the 1st episode has my vote as perhaps the best opening in terms of presenting the characters.

Ok, so it was long winded. Same scene repeated I think 4 times, from the perspective of Tony, Mark, Emily and the CIB. Since I didn't read the summary, I didn't know the relationship. It started with Mark, and his colleague got shot. Then the next perspective I realise was sayyyy Tony and it was from his angle, going back to those moments Mark was almost shot and he was sitting having lunch. Then it was Emily, ending with her having lunch as well and talking on the phone, cut to Tony on the phone as well. Then at the end of the 1st episode, this crazy frustrating mixed scenes were blended together and in that moment the viewer will know Tony was actually talking to Mark, Emily was having lunch with Tony her husband and there was several cover operations going on, on one side CIB and on the other O-kei. I find it very refreshing to see at least some innovative storyline but sadly that disappeared by episode 3. Can't blame TVB; that way of storytelling can be long winded, cumbersome and those without patience, confusing. But do give episode 1 a try. Superb if you ask me.

And what is most surprising about this series is that in some scenes, it can be very witty and very very funny. Such as Daniel's constant suspiscion of his colleague's sneaky manner and he thought he shot Mark. The way he accused him again and again and the explanations given should be seen to be believed. Then there's this character William Hung who seems more like a yes man to his boss. He was from OCTB (O-kei) transferred to CIB and he believes in feng shui so he actually put gold chimes into each of his boss' rooms. The idea that these policemen can be very superstitious was quite funny and the reaction of his immediate superior, Kim played by TVB's only caucasion actor was funny. In the last episode William thought Kim hated him so he went to Kim to give him his request to transfer and Kim not only shouted at him, but actually slammed the door at his face when William asked "Well then, what time should I give you this request?!" and Kim said "If you must, come back after midnight!!!". And in this series funniest scene which could also be quite tragic, around midnight Mark was alone in office. He was walking out when one suspect shooter of Mark escaped the OCTB guys, stole a gun and had it pointed at Mark. At the same time Daniel and colleague was in office and tried to talk the guy out of shooting Mark. And then Kim appeared with Emily's father (a feng shui master) also appeared talking and saw what was happening and that suspect feeling very frustrated cried "Don't you people ever go home?!!". That was so funny and suddenly a shot was fired and it was William who fired the shot and you must remember why Wiliam was back in office; he wanted to give the letter to Kim at midnight! It's true, nobody goes home at CIB. And later we found out why Kim was prejudiced against William. Kim scolded William about the gold chimes not because he was not superstitious, in fact he believed in feng shui but it was because his astrological chart said that year he can't have gold in his office! And he avoided William because William was born in the year of the dog and he must avoid dogs! Why William was asked to come back was because after midnight there would no longer be such restriction. Silly but funny.

The biggest mystery though was who shot Mark. I kept guessing and guessing and in the end I guessed wrong and that was even when I exhausted all suspect already! Quite a mystery actually.

However the story was at times ridiculously funny. Maybe it was trying too hard but I found the following almost a reason to just avoid this almost, quite almost crappy series:-

1. Joe Jr's comb over. Already that man is bald, can't the writer give him some dignity as to give him style? why the comb over? I can't take him seriously.

2. the character of Daniel and the performance of Wai Ka Hung can be over the top sometimes, especially the unnecessarily dramatic argument between Daniel and Mark over the issue of Samantha towards the end. In fact I felt it was not just badly written but should not have been that way in the first place. Daniel clearly stepped out of the line.

3. What's wrong with the OCTB guys? Why are they always marching? Why is it that when they leave a room they march? When the come into a room they march? Why when they open a door they almost always break it down? And why in every operation they would either do a tarzan-like stunt or their favourite, roll over and point the gun? And don't they never ever smile that they're so robotic and yet when they're emotional it felt so wrong?

4. what's up with William Hung? What is his job? Does he even have one?

5. Why the inconsistencies in Kim? Earlier scene had him dismissing feng shui as superstition and yet the last episode he was actually very superstitious? Somehow forgot about that one tiny point?

6. I don't get the ending. I mean it is an ending alright but it was as if too much has been edited out. The ending was in fact quite horrible. I like the ending for the characters but I didn't like the ambiguity of it. Like

a. when Emily was hurt by Jimmy's crazy ex girlfriend, what happened? Who saved her? She looked like she was in peril

b. when Emily was in the hospital, how much time has passed since the attack? Was she disabled or was that wheelchair just a standard prop for patients in a hospital?

c. when did Emily and Tony reconciled?

d. when did Samantha and Mark reconciled? I mean one scene they're barely talking to one another and the last scene, loving, kissing and even hinting on them living in together since Mark said "I didn't bring the keys, I don't want to disturb father" and Samantha said "Well why didn't you call me? I could have given the key to you".

e. so what about Yip Sir and his love lost with the owner of the restaurant? What happened?

I was so confused with the last 15 minutes I just feel there were so many unanswered questions. The ending was like neither here nor there and I was very disappointed with it.

And what is most ridiculous is two very capable reporters should open their own magazine publishing business instead of one being a TV reporter and the other considering retirement. After all they did all the jobs, they have connections and I am sure they have some money. And how could a policeman, however high ranking afford such a big apartment, such big expensive cars and sending his son overseas for studies? His wife paid for it? Are there no poor people in TVB dramas anymore?

The ending almost killed this series where things suddenly slowed down real ssssllllooooooowwwwwwwwww, just to drag the ending to the perhaps 1 hour mark.

Luckily the performances were consistent.

I have said what I wanted to say about Bowie Lam.

Christine Ng, also I have said what I wanted to say, except I must add this is perhaps one of her best performance. Emily is complex, at one point totally could be hated but somehow she is a decent woman who labours under some major misunderstanding. It would have been nice though to see Emily smiling happily at Tony for once.

Wong He gave an above average performance which borderlines "back to his old self again" type. There was a time he was bloody pretentious. Somehow he looks smug about it. He still do but Mark is like his older characters he have played that established his name; goofy, silly, cute, nice, lovable, and rough on the edges. His best performance was when he looks at Maggie, he actually looked smitten! Anyway why I say above average instead of great is because I was so disappointed with his recent performances that I feel a slight improvement to his old self does not merit those over the top praises. There are still some moments he seems rather pretentious. I don't know why but I just feel at times he was like reading the script instead of actually actin the script. But at least this is one of his better performance in recent memory. By the way Wong He looks good in here, put on a bit of weight but still looks like a capable athlete with a very well toned body. I am sure he can outrun everybody in this series.

Maggie Siu was a revelation. First of all she looks ultra modern, hip and very feminine without looking weak. I love her image in here and the boots and everything else. Her performance was quite spot on as well as those reporters who are very ambitious. The way she held her phone, the ear piece, and every aspect of it. To see her having something to do in a proactive manner rather than her dismal character in Dance Of Passion was very welcoming. I love her scenes with Wong He and as smitten as Wong He looked, the way Maggie looked at Wong He it was as if he was the one, the only one true love of her entire life and for eternity as well. How can you not love such a convincing performance?

Chan Hung Lit is fast becoming my favourite veteran actor. His performance in Dance Of Passion was hindered by a complete lack of characterisation but in here he had little action but loads of words. He looks refined and handsome in his well cut suit and glasses and cane. He does look like Wong He and Bowie Lam's father, except more handsome. His cantonese is stil hard to understand but not as hard as way back then. After War & Beauty I had a soft spot for him. HEY! He was Bowie's father in there as well!! No wonder the chemistry was there already! Anyway I enjoyed his performance in here and he is fast becoming THE actor to play someone's father.

Kenny Wong was surprisingly quite funny eventhough he had little to do although he proved pivotal to the story since he was the only officer in CIB who holds a gun as he was just transferred from CIB.

Patricia Liu looks convincing as a policewoman since she does look like a strong woman and an intellectual. But she had little scenes and anyway this series is already overcrowded with characters so less focus on her is ok. But I was pleasantly surprised she didn't end up as Tony's lover since I did expected that. If it was Astrid Chan (assuming her name is still Astrid since chinese stars have a habit of changing their english names), I would bet you all my fortune that she would end up falling for Tony. Whether she actually has an affair with Tony or not does not matter. Astrid Chan has been condemned to forever play the role of a mistress/would be mistress/wannabe mistress.

Joey Chan playing the son Michael is quite ok although how old is he? Not 15 right? Not much comment actually. But he does have more chemistry with Bowie and Emily than Bowie and Emily themselves.

I was quite impressed with 3 female performances; Rachel Kan, Queenie Chu and Chow Ka Yee. I find Rachel Kan, the one who played Samantha's assistant very pretty in here. She gave a credible performance. Chow Ka Yee was quite cute and played the character of an understanding but just as ruthless sister of Christine Ng's Emily very well as well. As much as I enjoyed watching the rivalry between Emily and Samantha, the rivalry between the assistants were also very well scripted. Now Queenie Chu, who plays Jimmy's former lover was surprisingly very watchable. Her Rachel was smart, capable, hardworking and surprisingly honourable. I find it quite funny that a mistress when given a meaningful job to do actually liked the fact that she had a purpose in life that she quit being the mistress! She can improve of course but maybe this role suits her like a glove. She does look like a naive young mistress in the beginning and I find the way she delivered her lines suitable for the mood of that scene which is almost very tranquil like. I suspect anything more she may fail to deliver but for this series itself, I think her performance deserves a mention.

Ellesmere Choi is a waste of screentime. His role is just to throw in some drama and some suspense and it all turned out to be a fluke. And the man himself looks bloated. My reaction upon seeing him was the same as the reaction of the maid when she saw the young Michael walking into the house with spiky coloured hair and tattoo; which is "OH MY GOD!!!". What happened to Ellesmere? How can he from secondary become almost first choice to now back to secondary and worse, in the danger of slipping into ke-le-fe-dom?

Joe Jr was a waste of screen time. His hair, his wig, his performance killed his character. If he didn't I would.

Yu Yeung will forever be remembered as "THE LUCKY DEVIL" for having hugged/touched a min 4 beautiful women in War & Beauty, an honour previously and consistently held by TVB's favourite Emperor, Kong Wah who has my vote as Bowie's replacement for the character of Tony if there was ever a sequel. I miss Kong Wah. Anyway Yu Yeung played his role of the disgusting Jimmy to the hilt. His mouth and the way it moved did the trick.

Whilst Lok Ying Kwan delivers a strong performance, his character Yip Sir, apart from being the obligatory friend and mentor in this series, hardly had anything else to do. He didn't get the ending he deserves. I mean give him a proper ending, give him a wife.

Now the biggest and most pleasant surprise was Belle Lau playing a rich woman, Elaine, wife of the devious Jimmy. So her role was extremely short but I was very surprised to see her really looking the part.

The guys at the OCTB were just flukes. Nothing much to do and I suppose meant to be the joke of this series. It quite almost turned the table and made the series into a joke.

Verdict
Very interesting series with very interesting filming techniques, the 1st episode must be seen to experience what is the difference whilst the rest of the series is less about CIB and crime investigation but more about human drama and relationships or the disintergration of it. If you're looking for a consistent story, this is not it. It is in fact slow and at times you may be wondering what is going on. The ending itself may leave you cold since so many unanswered questions. But if you're looking for good storytelling with compelling characters that actually goes through changes with the main actors delivering the goods, this is it. This series takes time to get used to and to digest but I find the characterisation not only compelling but very true to human nature. Emily turns out to be a very compelling character to watch. None of them are complex at all but just ... well compelling.The soundtrack is used to great effect but the themesong suck. The dialogue is at times realistic, sometimes moving and interestingly sometimes witty and seriously funny. This series actually has all that but there are also some elements that leave you cold. Whatever it may be, fans of Christine Ng, Wong He, Bowie Lam and especially Maggie Cheung should check out this series. All 4 major actors delivered the goods and this is a rare thing in TVB series these days that the actors can be consistent individually and in an ensemble cast. Moreover, see if you feel the same way I did about Bowie Lam.


Interesting Poster
I really like the following poster. In fact I don't think I can ever erase from my memory that they're not actual brothers although they look it, eyes wise. If you notice carefully, nothing else matches.


Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us





Share:

15 December 2007

SPIDER-MAN 3 [Mov]

Written by Funn Lim
 

"This movie is just too hectic, too many villains, too little coherent storyline to top movie 2 and become a worthy end to the Spiderman franchise, if indeed there won't be a Spiderman 4. What a pity!"

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

SPOILERS ... SPOILERS ... SPOILERS
Released In
2007

Cast-Character
Tobey Maguire - Spider-Man / Peter Parker
Kirsten Dunst - Mary Jane Watson
James Franco - New Goblin / Harry Osborn
Thomas Haden Church - Sandman / Flint Marko
Topher Grace - Venom / Edward 'Eddie' Brock
Bryce Dallas Howard - Gwen Stacy
Rosemary Harris - May Parker
J.K. Simmons - J. Jonah Jameson
James Cromwell - Captain Stacy
Theresa Russell - Emma Marko
Dylan Baker - Dr. Curt Connors
Bill Nunn - Joseph 'Robbie' Robertson

Plot Summary
Taken from IMDB.com

Peter Parker has finally managed to piece together the once-broken parts of his life, maintaining a balance between his relationship with Mary-Jane and his responsibility as Spider-Man. But more challenges arise for our young hero. Peter's old friend Harry Obsourne has set out for revenge against Peter; taking up the mantle of his late father's persona as The New Goblin, and Peter must also capture Uncle Ben's real killer, Flint Marko, who has been transformed into his toughest foe yet, the Sandman. All hope seems lost when suddenly Peter's suit turns jet-black and greatly amplifies his powers. But it also begins to greatly amplify the much darker qualities of Peter's personality that he begins to lose himself to. Peter has to reach deep inside himself to free the compassionate hero he used to be if he is to ever conquer the darkness within and face not only his greatest enemies, but also...himself.

Comments
I have watched Spiderman 1, 2 and now 3 and I will say outright; no. 2 is the best in the series and no. 3 the worst. There are reasons why no. 2 is the best, which are exactly the opposite of why no. 3 os the worst. So let's highlight why no. 3 is the worst although most papers would have you believe it is the best.

Too many villains, too many heroes, too many people with unnatural / supernatural / technological power
Exactly as my title suggests. In this movie, we have technically 2 heroes and 4 villains, where 2 people are interchangeable as villain and hero. Very strange and definitely overcrowded.

For one, Harry Osborne was a villain for the fact that he wanted our favourite superhero, Spiderman to die. Then he lost his memory, which I actually thought was an act by Harry aka Green Goblin but it turned out to be actually real memory loss and he became the nice guy, then he got back his memory and turned bad guy and then his conscience came back to haunt him and with some explanation by his faithful butler, he was good guy again. At this moment with the butler doing the explanation, I was thinking maybe Batman will pop into the movie for a quick guest appearance to bring up the tally of good guys as against the bad guys.

Then we have Flint Marko aka Sandman who may actually be a good guy because he wanted to steal money to save his dying daughter who then Spiderman found out to be the bad guy as he was suspected of killing his wise old Uncle Ben in movie no. 1 but Sandman said it wasn't like that so I thought maybe he didn't but he actually did for some lame excuse like a misfiring gun so that kinda made me thought he was a good guy but before that he teamed up with Venom to create havoc and to kill Spiderman, the one guy everybody with some unnatural/supernatural power wanted dead so I thought Sandman was a bad guy and in the end he turned out to be a desperate guy who then became a sand and kinda flew away. I am still wondering did he die? Did he suddenly evaporate? Can sand ever die or evaporate? If he were to find a wife, will he make sand babies?

There was then Edward 'Eddie' Brock who was this jerk of a reporter who was trying to steal Peter Parker's thunder and then he became Venom, whose name was never actually revealed in the movie as Venom with a suprisingly big sharp teeth and a big mouth with a rather cool black almost spidey-like outfit who seemed bad but not quite, good but not quite, redeemed but not quite, in the end dead and definitely no not quites in that department.

We have Spidey himself who for a moment became rather egoistical, angry and temperamental when that dark like subtance which never had a name except for some scientific sounding name like Symbiote whatever which bonded with Spidey's outfit making it a cool black colour. Spidey intelligently ripped that thing away from his suit or rather ripper his own suit away from his body in what may be the best scene in the movie.

Even the symbiote whatever itself has a character, and this movie suddenly took an alien-like turn with a meteorite falling to earth and this thing following Spidey home.

In the final confrontation we have 4, sorry 5 (including the symbiote now bonded with Eddie to become Venom) fighting with one another. Too many characters and suddenly with all these weird characters that were a big departure from the past 2 movies (where the villains were first and foremost humans who became too reliant on technology and became a tech baddie of some sort) who all suddenly became a Superman or Fantastic Four movie. It just became a kiddie film and I was expecting Bionic Woman to turn up for some gender equality during the fight scenes.

Impossible Villains, Impossible to die
Impossible as in they will never die. Well amongst all the characters with some powers in this movie, the Green Goblin is the Batman of the lot; human but became superhero by way of techonology which means amongst the 4 (Sandman, Venom, Spidey and the Green Goblin), Green Goblin is the most vulnerable as he was flesh and blood. And indeed, dear Harry will suffer the most in terms of physical. I mean he got himself scarred on his handsome face for heaven's sake whilst Spidey, pounded on the chest by a big sand-like hand didn't even get a scratch on his chest. That's not fair.

Anyway, Venom could be killed as seen in this movie by a bomb. But it did take a bomb. Sandman is probably the immortal in this movie, apart from Spidey (have you seen a spider die after being thrown off a 100 storey building?). Sandman can't die, won't die and did not die. Not even turning into mud after being thrown water on his sand-like body could kill him. In fact nothing did kill him and the final scene of his flying away with the wind was well ... a scene befitting an immortal. I expect he will take up residence in some high mountain somewhere and learn the way of the Tao and become a deity.

And Spiderman himself; why is everyone so scared he will die I wonder? He will never die. Being flung the way he was, bombed the way he was, pounded on the way he was, he still didn't die. Maybe drowning him will kill him but that was never explored in all 3 movies and since there is no movie no. 4, we will never know.

The Decoration
As in this movie? Well not the buildings or ke-le-fes but rather the women. Gwen Stacey's job is to flirt with both Spidey and Peter, not really telling us whether she fancies Peter or Spidey and then to look terribly sorry for being flaunted around by the evil Peter in front of MJ.

MJ, and that is not Michael Jackson but Mary Jane's job is to feel disappointed, unsatisfied, jealous, angry, scared, terribly understanding at times and most of all, scream. In fact MJ has been in peril in all 3 movies, each time she was flung from somewhere high which requires Spidey to make some life altering choices when attempting to save her and finally saved her and gently flung her to safety with her looking bewildered and yet very turned on by Spidey's bravery and heroism and knowing that Spidey, after Movie 2 is Peter makes it more interesting I suppose. Anyway she screamed and screamed and screamed and still looking a little flustered but never quite in tears. I mean when I do get flung out of the taxi like that with sand-like person flying everywhere, excuse me, I will cry. Tears of fear down my cheek as I scream to safety. You know what I mean?

Aunt May, probably the only character with something useful to do and yet in this movie, she is just a walk on role and the one assuming Uncle Ben's position of giving some timely advice to Spidey and then nothing more. Why can't we see Aunt May being flung out of the taxi instead of MJ? And in midway she has a heart attack and so Spidey now has to decide whether to

a. save the falling MJ

b. fight sandman and venom, both terrorising ... they were terrorising Spidey only, not really the city itself, so I suppose fight these two who were threatening MJ and terrorising him

c. take Aunt May to the hospital in a matter of minutes before she expires

d. Sandman and Venom actually out to kill the people of New York or hold them at ransom for something, so Spidey has to save New York as well

e. do all at once and save the day.

Hard choices but more exciting.

Is NY in peril, again?
In all 3 movies, the villains seem to have very personal agendas against Spidey and for some reasons other than killing the good folks in the much terrorized in film, New York. It's true. Green Goblin wanted Spidey dead, so he did what he did. Octavious in movie 2 wanted to kill spidey and to continue his study on some energy field so he did what he did. In movie 3, Sandman, Venom and earlier Green Goblin all wanted Spiderman dead. None of these villains directly wanted to cause serious damage or harm to New York so well, it's kinda repetetive. and small scale.

Best friends fighting one another, how unoriginal
This has been brewing for 2 movies, Harry vs Peter ever since we saw Harry rather jealous when Peter got MJ and really murderous when he thought Spidey aka Peter killed his father. So finally we got to see these two fight it out in movie 3 and it felt like 2 kids fighting one another, like some high school feud. And it was so long since it took 2 fights. The only good part was an angry evil Peter telling a very stubborn Harry that he was tired of trying to explain to Harry what actually happened and that daddy never really loved Harry. Well ouch, so childlike banter if you ask me, that part where daddy never really loved poor Harry. I mean Peter is that the best insult you can thrown at that stubborn Harry? I am sure you can do better.

Returning characters
In the opening title sequence we have flashbacks of the previous 2 movies. Probably the best scene in here. And then we have Uncle Ben making some appearances for his death scene and then we have the usual Norman Osborne back to cause havoc in Harry's very vulnerable mental state. If I may add, once too many times.

The entire storyline
... is the problem. It's too fast, too hectic, too confusing and would you believe it, too long despite the fact that 2 hours isn't really long in movie world. This movie made Return Of The King seem normal length and I suspect, it is because it is just boring. And they had to kill someone and I thought wouldn't it be nice if MJ dies? That would be shocking but they killed...well watch the movie and you will know. The death seem seems corny at best.

The entire movies feels old, tired, rehashed, long, at times confusing, mostly repetetive and always quite didn't make me feel for Spidey. I love movie 1 where Spidey was really nerdy who became a superhero. Then in movie 2 he was really poor for a superhero but he did great things, with some scenes moving me to tears. But movie 3, sure he was a villain and there were 2 rather long scenes of Peter doing some disco dancing on the streets and on the floor looking like the manic Green Day lead singer but these scenes just feel like a joke. It wasn't even funny, it was rather disturbing because Spidey thinks he is sexy when he is making a fool of himself. Or maybe that is the main point of these scenes. Even angry Peter didn't seem to menacing at all, acting just like an angry high school kid when his girlfriend ignores him. This movie just fails on so many level because for once, I feel nothing for the villains, not even poor Harry.

SPOILERS
And talking about Harry, I was watching the commercial of Spiderman 3 on TV and I just made this remark "Poor Harry, died" and my sister suddenly screamed "WHAT?! POTTER DIED?!". Which proves my point. His death made no impact at all, except to cause some anxiety in some Potter fans who when heard Harry, immediately assumed Potter to be the last name.

Performances
Tobey Maguire as usual is excellent as Peter Parker and has a great body for Spiderman. His best scenes are those where he cried, big tears sliding down his baby faced cheeks, ala Elijah Wood in Lord Of The Rings. In fact these two should hold a contest as to who can cry the most beautifully since the way they cry is like silent tears, not quite manly but not quite boyish, both with beautiful features and skin. Anyway seriously he was good even as bad Peter.

Kirsten Dunst. Ok lar, she was never famous for her acting prowess and she was adequate as MJ in all 3 movies although she now seems older than Peter Parker himself. Maybe not having a career is stressful? Her MJ is now like Peter in movie 2, broke, down and out. Kirsten had to expand her lungs more in here as she had more screen time to scream but she also has some time to flesh out a bit of acting in terms of acting angry, jealous, confused, used, betrayed, insulted, etc which basically were the same expressions consisting mainly of how teary the eyes are, not opened her mouth is and how big or small her eyes become. Seriously, ok performance.

Bryce Dallas Howard. Simply unrecognisable. I can't believe she was the same girl in The Village and Lady In The Water. In fact looking at her I felt if she had made her movie debut earlier, she could have been MJ. Anyway acting wise no comments because she hardly had anything to do except to kiss Spidey, look hurt and nothing else. So basically wasted kinda casting. Anybody could have performed this role. In fact to save money why didn't the producers just put a wig on Kirsten and let her do dual roles?

James Franco. As Harry in movie 1 and 2, he had little to do except to be James Dean; moody, angry, unhappy except for the rebellious part. In movie 3, he is still all that, except he got to do it on the Green Goblin flying machine. His earlier scenes where he lost his memory were scary; I thought he was putting on an act. He didn't seem genuine and when this actor really smiled, it felt sinister and forced. I didn't believe him. And his last scene was ... well it was corny, it was funny, it was not at all touching or sad or anything at all. Just that because before he appeared in that scene I thought he was dead with that bomb going off near him but he didn't die. The only time I felt "Poor thing" was when I saw his scarred face on that formerly beautiful handsome face. Poor thing. Acting wise, average at best, even in movies 1 and 2.

Willem Dafoe. He can continue to make guest appearances in this movie because even if one scene and one line, he was better than the rest of them, save for Tobey Maguire.

Topher Grace. Nice name, could hardly believe he's that sweet kid from That 70s Show. In here he was malicious, ambitious, evil, angry. Good performance but hardly anything much to do except to be angry and snarl a bit at poor Peter.

Thomas Haden Church. Totally wasted. All those hoopla about his role and mostly it was computer generated, all those body building and I didn't see past his waist and all those hoopla about his performance and voice, all I could see was one stony face after another stony face. Bad performance? Maybe not but definitely overrated and blank most of the time. He made Tobey Maguire feels like a person with so much feelings he could burst. I can't see the point to this character and the so called forgiveness issue, well overblown since Spidey took only 10 seconds to decide to forgive Sandman. Not much conflict when there should be more, emotionally.

Verdict
So my verdict? The trailer was good, in fact better than the final product. The whole black Spidey costume was so interesting in the trailer because the danger felt imminent since evil Spidey would mean the world may be at peril but in the movie it was kinda childish, that it was all good for showing off and showing a bit of anger but nothing else. Even Venom isn't so bad considering he directed all his anger at killing Spiderman. The whole vengeance thing seems so limited, so personal and yet does not engage, involve nor provoke the viewers. Well watch it just to complete the whole sage thing but this movie by itself is tiring and long and when watched with movies 1 and 2, I shall add boring to the list. Give me Spiderman 2 anytime. This movie is just too hectic, too many villains, too little coherent storyline to top movie 2 and become a worthy end to the Spiderman franchise, if indeed there won't be a Spiderman 4. What a pity!

Interesting Fact
Is it me or that the Spiderman series is probably the cleanest movie ever? Cleanest as in no foul language of any kind? Definitely no *F word, can't remember hearing any *S or *D word, not even the *H word (except maybe as a verb) or the * B word (if you're British) and hey, no *S word or scenes as well. CLEAN!!

Did you see Peter Parker actually eating in this movie? He hardly even sleeps except for one short moment when he was waiting for news of Flint Marko on the police radio. I didn't even see Harry eating. Not even MJ. Nobody eats in this movie except for Marko who almost did. How strange.

Likewise nobody showers in this movie. Thanks to his Sandlike body, poor Marko Flint will never get to shower anymore. The upside is of course saving money on the water bill. Can he drink?



* F = F**K, S = SHIT, D = DAMN, H = HELL, S = SHIT, B = BLOODY
Share:

L4YER CAKE [Mov]

Written by Funn Lim
 

"The moment she (Sienna Miller) spoke, the entire scene was ruined."

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

SPOILERS ... SPOILERS ... SPOILERS
Released in
2004

Based on
A book with the same title written by J.J. Connolly.

Cast-Character
Daniel Craig ... XXXX
Tom Hardy ... Clarkie
Jamie Foreman ... Duke
Sally Hawkins ... Slasher
Burn Gorman ... Gazza
George Harris ... Morty
Tamer Hassan ... Terry
Colm Meaney ... Gene
Marcel Iures ... Slavo
Francis Magee ... Paul the Boatman
Dimitri Andreas ... Angelo
Kenneth Cranham ... Jimmy Price
Garry Tubbs ... Brian
Nathalie Lunghi ... Charlie
Marvin Benoit ... Kinky (as Marvyn Benoit)
Ben Whishaw ... Sidney
Sienna Miller ... Tammy

Plot Summary
Taken from IMDB.com

A successful cocaine dealer, who has earned a respected place among England's Mafia elite, plans an early retirement from the business. However, big boss Jimmy Price hands down a tough assignment: find Charlotte Ryder, the missing rich princess daughter of Jimmy's old pal Edward, a powerful construction business player and gossip papers socialite. Complicating matters are two million pounds' worth of Grade A ecstasy, a brutal neo-Nazi sect and a whole series of double crossings. The title "LAYER CAKE" refers to the layers or levels anyone in business goes through in rising to the top. What is revealed is a modern underworld where the rules have changed. There are no 'codes', or 'families' and respect lasts as long as a line. Not knowing who he can trust, he has to use all his 'savvy', 'telling' and skills which make him one of the best, to escape his own. The ultimate last job, a love interest called Tammy, and an international drug ring threaten to draw him back into the 'cake mix'. But, time is running out and the penalty will endure a lifetime.

Comments
I may not be accurate about the plot summary which I have written below this paragraph but I didn't make a mistake when I typed the title. It is L4yer Cake as in Se7ev or Sle7in. Don't ask me why, maybe it is hip to misspell with an impossible to pronounce word. Anyway this movie was directed by Matthew Vaughn, Mr Claudia Schiffer for those uninitiated and rumour has it this movie was what got Daniel Craig noticed by his future major employer, those at the 007 camp, Barbara Brocolli. However it is a huge mistake to assume this role is Bond-ish because it is very far removed from the Bond factor. I suspect he got the role simply because he has magnetic screen presence and somehow Barbara Brocolli saw past the skinny frame (when clothed) and saw a very untraditionally handsome man, which I suspect that scene with his half naked helped since he didn't look that skinny without his clothes on. Whatever is the reason, L4yer Cake is an enjoyable movie on many levels that is very British feel if you ask me with a storyline that gets more and more out of hand as the story goes towards an ending that may shock you. I said may because what I like about the ending is there is no good ending, more so for a drug dealer.

This movie is about an unnamed drug dealer and the only regret a viewer may have is when you almost know his name, he met his fate. So for simplicity sake, Daniel Craig is credited as XXXX. Not XXX but XXXX. He has no name since he narrates his own story and no one says his name since well they just appear and speak right into his face. What is interesting about this movie is how unglamarous a drug dealer is. He doesn't just deal with ecstacy pills, he deals with heroin and cocaine as well. He is not a small time dealer, he is in fact a big time dealer working for a boss who works for a bigger boss (Michael Gambon) but after many years involved in a trade that requires total anonymity, he decides to retire. However he couldn't retire just yet because he want to make one last big deal for the money. And right in the middle of that he has to deal with a bunch of first timers tigger happy nervous looking dealers who stole a big bag of ecstacy pill belonging to the Russian mafia who is hunting them down and XXXX is interested in purchasing those pills. Then he meets a woman that ignites his lust, Tammy (Sienna Miller) who well... no story for that one, although this woman indirectly contributed to his end. And mixed into that his boss and his boss' boss asking, in not a very nice way to help them to do something that is to find his missing daughter and he ended up being beaten up badly by his fellow colleagues who thought he betrayed one of their own. It's a mad world XXXX is in and it is his aim to retire clean, rich and alive. No easy task.

There were times I couldn't follow the whole plot since well my English is not so good you see and there are so many types of accent, ranging from easy to very difficult to hear and the sound system isn't so good, maybe just my DVD. Made worse is that this movie is dialogue heavy but get past all that, it is a highly enjoyable movie. Male audiences loved it, female audiences loved it too although maybe for an entirely different reason.

I normally don't like this kind of story and I avoid any story about dealers, robbers or such which talks about one big last heist or the likes. Howeve this movie sets itself apart from the norm. What I like most though is that British feel that somehow is very English. The direction, the storytelling, the acting... can't seem to find such style in Hollywood which is interesting in itself. The performances are most top notch, except for that one that nearly killed this movie.

Sienna Miller was totally and horribly overrated as an actress and worse still, overrated itself is still not enough to describe how overrated she is. Why is it that bad actors always bat their eyelids so fast, ala Madonna? Her first scene with Daniel Craig was supposed to be very seductive in the sense he fell in lust with her, as she danced sexily to the music whilst smoking and staring at him. The moment she spoke, the entire scene was ruined. In fact her appearance in this movie ruined that scene. Although Daniel Craig as XXXX really looked like he was about to jump on her, with such desire in his eyes even with the loud music and a young man yacking away next to him, his steel blue eyes only had eyes for her and she knew it and he knew she knew he knew it. Could that have been a real attraction? Because rumours had it they were having affair, maybe not during the filming of this movie but later? I couldn't help but believe it true. Many male co-stars were simply enamoured with her and in this movie, Daniel Craig was clearly smitten. I wouldn't even say XXXX but I would say the man himself. The next scene she was in the scene where they had kinda like dirty talk over the phone and she went to his hotel, they kissed, she changed into lingerie, he got bundled off to see Michael Gambon's character. That was probably the only scene she did well like in all movies she made where she had to be either naked or near naked. But that takes experience, not acting chops. The final scene she was in was the last scene as she was walking with the now retired XXXX. In fact she had very few lines, with or without her the movie will not die and even if without her it is not difficult to understand why XXXX died although he was shot by a jealous boyfriend. The thing is Sienna Miller contributed nothing of significance to this movie and she almost spoilt it with her awful performance. And yet there you see her name on the DVD covers and I assume her legs, making it look like some Roger Moore type of Bond movie poster. And yes, even in her other roles, Casanova (where she delivered a plea of love without a single emotion in her eyes), Stardust (where she was more terrible than haughty) and every movies she has ever made including Factory Girl (overacting). She is not worse than Madonna but then Madonna is a singer trying to be an actress and this Sienna Miller is an actress trying to be an actress. She just is an amateur and at the end of the day she is to me Hollywood's most overrated actress who is forever on the list of who's who without any concrete credit that that is because of her acting. If anyone is to be described as hot by association, she's the one. In other words, she was terrible in this movie.

Other than this woman, everyone else did a credible job from Colm Meany to Kingsley Shacklebolt ... I mean George Harris (well he played Kingsley Shacklebolt in Harry Potter movies). Even Michael Gambon with his face looking like the world is doomed played his part well although he may have been a total miscast as Dumbledore.

However the star was Daniel Craig himself. Considered his breakout movie role, after his Bond success the studio may have tried to repackage L4yer Cake as a pre-Bond film with his XXXX in leather jacket and holding guns, which is as far away from the characterisation of XXXX as protraying James Bond as an impotent fool, so to speak. XXXX hates guns by the way and he isn't that equipped in terms of ability to protect himself by the fist. What he has is cunning, and he is simply trying to retire alive and rich. But the repackaging worked and this movie got highlighted again as a must watch and now almost most reviews will write how this role got him the Bond role which is strange.

I must admit though, as skinny as he was in here, he has a body that is naturally crafted like those statutes in Greece. Beautiful pecs and all which I guess is in the jeans. I am just glad he put on some weight as he was very skinny in here although XXXX who sells drugs is not a drug addict himself. He is too smart for that.

There is no moral repurcussions in this movie. If you're looking for a moral debate about drug dealers and all, there isn't one. Even the end has nothing to do with the drugs, it was more personal rather than professional. XXXX has no police on his trail as he successfully hides himself from the authorities and doesn't show off with a brand new Aston Martin or dressed with killer suits. In fact Bond is more of a show off than him and considering Bond is a spy, that is a big thing. What this movie tells is really just about XXXX, retiring and facing some professional dilemma.

And that I believe is what makes this movie popular. The problems that XXXX faced is almost comical, it is almost funny, the lines are sometimes witty and the way he went about trying desperately to solve his own problems before he could retire is almost hilarious. Almost because the viewers know if he fails his life would be at stake. This is a man desperate to safeguard his own interest without stepping on everyone else's toes so as to make it out alive. The best scene had to be his reaction to the use of guns (he hated it) and the most memorable scene where his black colleague who seemed so calm and zen like and quiet all the time exploded and beaten someone to death, much to his shock. The shocked look on his face was priceless and very funny when that guy said now he had to run since he killed someone, and he just ran, leaving XXXX standing by the roadside, still shocked. For a man who is dealing with drugs, he must have been those kind that deals with drugs but does not deal with the violence that is sometimes associated with drugs. You get a feeling that he is in the end just a businessman, although he may be dealing in illegal substance. And a businessman who is about to retire will try his best not to dirty his hands, since he never did dirty his hands before.

Daniel Craig's performance borderlines on a man who tries very hard to keep his composure but he is wrecked with an increasing fear and panic that he may be digging his own grave. His XXXX is desperate, scared, and is pushed to do things he didn't want to do but he had no choice. I think he is not your typical image of the tough street cred drug dealer and gives a different perspective to a rather romanticised image of a dealer. And I like that. And yes, he can act really well, very magnetic and his eyes draws you in. His XXXX is neither brave or heroic nor tough or a bully, just human being trying to make a decent living at the end of the day.

So if there is a reason to watch this movie, I don't think watching it with a pre-conception that it is like a Bond type of movie will help you to enjoy the film. You will be severely disappointed. But if you watch it to see a highly entertaining movie about survival (it feels that way to me) and to watch why Daniel Craig was chosen as Bond which has nothing to do with his character but rather the way he could strut around looking cool and calm when inside he is filled with fear and panic, this is the movie for you. This at the end of the day is an ensemble piece that works best when all elements are seen together rather than pinpoint one single reason. Moreover it is the fact that it is an ensemble piece that managed to save this from total annihilation by one single person which I am sure you already know who.

Verdict
For Daniel Craig, YESSSS!!! For Sienna Miller, NEVERRRRRRR!!! Anyway a really interesting movie with Daniel Craig signature character; inwardly increasing panic, outwardly an epitome of calm but with panicky eyes. You know what I mean.

Share:

ENDURING LOVE [Mov]

Written by Funn Lim


"Daniel Craig is really good at playing a man who is stuck with increasing panic and yet managed to stay outwardly calm but innately he is breaking into pieces."

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

SPOILERS ... SPOILERS ... SPOILERS
Released In
2004

Based on
A book of the same title by Ian McEwan who I think wrote Atonement, which is of course made into a movie starring the very popular (for reasons I could never understand) Keira Knightley) and mega popular James McAvoy.

Cast-Character
Daniel Craig ... Joe
Samantha Morton ... Claire
Bill Weston ... Grandfather
Jeremy McCurdie ... Boy in Balloon (as Jeremy Mccurdie)
Lee Sheward ... John Logan
Nick Wilkinson ... Farmer
Rhys Ifans ... Jed
Bill Nighy ... Robin
Susan Lynch ... Rachel
Ben Whishaw ... Spud
Justin Salinger ... Frank
Andrew Lincoln ... TV Producer
Helen McCrory ... Mrs. Logan
Rosie Michell ... Katie Logan (as Rosanna Michell)
Ella Doyle ... Katie Logan's Friend

Plot Summary
Taken from IMDB.com.

On a beautiful cloudless day a young couple celebrate their reunion with a picnic. Joe has planned a postcard-perfect afternoon in the English countryside with his partner, Claire. But as Joe and Claire prepare to open a bottle of champagne, their idyll comes to an abrupt end. A hot air balloon drifts into the field, obviously in trouble. The pilot catches his leg in the anchor rope, while the only passenger, a boy, is too scared to jump down. Joe and three other men rush to secure the basket. Just as they secure the balloon, the wind rushes into the field, and at once the rescuers are airborne. Joe manages to drop to the ground, as do most of his companions, but one man is lifted skywards. As Joe, Claire and the other rescuers watch this strangely beautiful sight, they see the man fall to his death. Recalling the day's events at dinner with his friends Robin and Rachel, Joe reveals the impact the accident has had on his battered psyche. Ironically the balloon eventually lands safely, the boy unscathed. But fate has far more unpleasant things in store for Joe. Going to retrieve the body of the fallen man with fellow rescuer Jed Parry, for example, turns out to be a very bad move. Jed feels an instant connection with Joe--one that, as the weeks go by, becomes ever more intense.

Comments
The title can be very misleading because you might think this is a love story. It may be but of a twisted kind. Not Fatal Attraction but quite almost there. The story in here deals with one man's obssession with another man.

Jed and Joe (any reason why both names start with the alphabet J?) met during a rescue attempt of a flyaway hotair balloon with a teenager in it. It started peacefully, with Joe enjoying a nice pinic with his live in girlfriend when they saw I think 2 or 3 men trying to stop a hot airballoon. It seems that ballon was accidentally released and there was a kid in it, very scared and afraid to jump. Joe immediately went to help, with all their might they couldn't stop it and one man hung to the rope and was carried high up into the sky whilst Jed and Joe let go. The man fell to his death and ironically the boy later landed safely. Joe was full of remorse and felt guilty that he let go, feeling perhaps he didn't display that sort of foolish bravery that that dead man did. One day he was approached by Jed who felt the same way. Together they went in search of the body, for a bit of closure. They connected through this event until Jed took it to another level. He used that as an excuse to keep seeing Joe and after a while that became an obssession when Jed was convinced Joe was trying to seduce him although Joe kept reminding Jed that wasn't the case. Jed became a stalker and Joe became increasingly worried that Jed may do something foolish to him. Joe tried to confide in his girlfriend, the sculptor but their relationship was already facing some problems. She didn't believe him, refused to even entertain his paranoia and Joe was left alone to fend for himself. After a while, Jed became obssessed with Joe and Joe could not turn to anyone, not even his close friends. Jed meanwhile was convinced Joe was in love with him and would do anything to set Joe free to love him. One day Joe already under a very strained relationship with his disbelieving girlfriend went home and saw Jed there, talking to her. Jed in fact told her his belief that Joe was in love with him and his girlfriend whilst doubtful didn't quite rebuke that either. Joe was fed up and decided to leave when Jed, feeling he has done something wrong tried to remedy the situation by taking what he view as the reason for Joe's leaving; Jed took a knife and stabbed Claire who was in complete shock over what happened. As she lied dying on her own pool of blood with the obssessed crazy Jed standing over her, Joe knew he had to do something. He didn't expect Jed to do what he did. So when Jed approached him and confessed his feelings, Joe allowed Jed to approach him and with one passionate kiss on the lips, Joe quickly took his chance, took the knife and stabbed Jed. Joe quickly rushed to Claire's side. The next scene we see Joe and Claire at the same picnic area, both trying to come to terms over what happened, Claire over her refusal to believe Joe and Joe over what happened with Jed. And they toasted each other. Meanwhile Jed didn't die. In fact he was incarcerated into a mental institution and he spent his day, every day writing a love letter to Joe.

The end.

Comments
Obssession. Is that what is meant by enduring love? An obssession, however negative is enduring in its own way? After I saw Casino Royale, I found many positive comments on Daniel Craig's performance in Enduring Love that I began hunting for the movie, apart from the movies Small Voices and The Mother which sadly could not be found. It was difficult to find and buy so in the end I found the torrent which took a long time to download. Was it worth all the trouble? Well, truth be told, the movie isn't your typical action or drama movie. It is hard to categorise the story and to call it a male Fatal Attraction story is not right. Joe is not a man trying to get Jed's attention, in fact Jed somehow misconstrued Joe's friendliness or rather saw things his own way. Jed is not a stable man, he has issues, maybe mental issues obviously but other issues as well as in this movie he is a homeless bum. This story is based on a book and apparently this movie's Jed differs vastly from the Jed in the book who had a career and an ordinary life. Maybe being a homeless bum justifies his obssession, since nothing better to do. It does chart quite interestingly the progression from strangers to friends to stalker to obssessed lover. Jed could turn up anytime at Joe's house, standing on the street all night, behind the window, in a restaurant, etc that as Joe one would be as creeped out as Joe was. Joe knew Jed was obssessed with him, that it was a sexual kind of obssession. We never knew Jed's past, whether he was a homosexual, whether his obssession stem from something in his past, etc. We don't even know is Jed is crazy or psychotic. He could have just been a man disillussioned by something and therefore his mind is set in a way that allows his imagination to flow free. Maybe he even genuinely believes that Joe is in love with him since it does look like Jed is a lonely sort of man. Why Jed specifically chose Joe is an unanswered question in this movie. We just had to accept Jed became enamoured with Joe.

Now Joe is not an unattractive man. He is involved in a relationship with a sculptor that seems perfectly normal but actually the relationship was cooling off for sometime. There lacks passion and his girlfriend through her work of art no longer find Joe as alluring or mysterious as she did before as she once said she couldn't sculp someone that she loves, and Joe later found his own face sculpted and he knew Claire no longer feels that way for him. She wasn't entirely encouraging or sympathetic either. When Joe first told her about Jed, she listened but after a while she stopped listening and when Joe saw Jed on the street opposite his house, he asked Claire to the window, urgently. Instead of doing just that, she dismissed his fears and went back to sleep. Granted Joe was panicking a lot but somehow she didn't seem such a concerned girlfriend. And when Jed approached her and told her his lies, she stood there without much to say to defend Joe which made Joe leave but of course Jed stabbed her to stop Joe from leaving.

One can understand Joe's fear and rising panic in himself. Jed is a bigger man than he was, and looked as manic. He is in no way displaying any traits of a homophobic man actually, just a man scared and haunted by an obssession of another. It is interesting how one tragedy brought them closer to each other and it takes another tragedy to break them apart. The story is narrated and unfolded slowly but consistently, there is no sleight of hand or some shocking revelation but somehow the story remains engaging throughout, especially that scene between Jed, Joe and Claire.

The ending was ambigous though. Until this day fans debated whether Joe and Claire reconciled. I can't remember what the book said but from what I can see, the girlfriend realised she was a jerk for disbelieving him, which was why she could not look Joe in his eyes when they were toasting one another. Some fans said it could be hurt or pain but I don't see Joe hurting her in anyway. She was't really the victim, she was the bystander and Joe the victim. In fact she hurt him by refusing to believe him. So when they sat down to have a picnic and toasting each other, it was like back to beginning of sorts, each making an effort to heal the rift. So in my interpretation when she refused or rather reluctantly looked into his eyes, it was more of shame that she didn't believe him than hurt that she suffered. So I suppose they got back together. What is great though is that manic eyes and sinister smile of Jed as we realised he was writing Joe a love letter. Now that is scary.

Poor Joe. What did he do to attract such unwanted attention?

Performance wise, it was mostly flawless.

Samantha Morton looked like she is half dead. Of course her Claire is a dimwitted fool who to me is the most discouraging girlfriend ever on the silver screen. She hasn't much to do actually so I can't comment much. She seems mostly dull, she has this blank look. Very difficult to describe her performance.

Rhys Ifans is a revelation simply because this was the underwear clad dirty best friend of Hugh Grant in Notting Hill. I could hardly recognise him since he gained a lot of weight here or rather in Notting Hill he was exceptionally thin. Now he is more famous as the one Sienna Miller is sleeping with. Interesting how she seems to date those within the circle of friends. Jude was good friends with Daniel, maybe still is. Daniel is good friends with Rhys. So the next stop is of course good friend of Rhys. Who knows? Anyway, I am just glad she is not in this movie and one would expect having dated so many talented men, she perhaps could have learned a bit of acting from them. Where was I? Oh yes, Rhys Ifans. Irish? What an accent but I could understand him. He looks messy in here, as he is in real life. His Jed is soft spoken, looks at Joe adoringly and much love. Daniel was right when he complimented his friend for his subtle performance. It was subtle but obviously subtle. His every stare, every eye contact and every gesture, almost romantic but so wrong. One of the best scene was when he met Joe on the street and Joe screamed at him to leave him alone but Jed, in front of everyone who cared to listen said loudly that perhaos Joe should stop seducing him with his eyes! Screaming like a jilted lover. Scary moment. An excellent performance of an increasingly mad lovelorn spurned lover.

Daniel Craig was excellent as well. His too was also a subtle performance. He was friendly with Jed at first but when he realised Jed didn't mean just friendship, he politely pushed Jed away until Jed refused to budge and that was when he became obssessed with being obssessed with. It's true! This is a movie where one man's obssession of another turned the other man into obssessed man himself. That's when he became scared, angry and then he exploded into rage. I love to watch the progression and I especially love the scene where he saw Jed and Claire together and when Claire didn't seem to believe Joe, he simply said alright and he just turned to leave! Fed up I'd say, why stick with one who refused to believe you eh? Daniel Craig is really good at playing a man who is stuck with increasing panic and yet managed to stay outwardly calm but innately he is breaking into pieces. It's all in the eyes and in here he adopts the intellectual look with the ugly huge glasses framing his slim face and highlighting the brilliant colour of his eyes. He was very slim in this movie, as slim as he was in L4yer Cake and a far cry from his Bond looks. Even with all the lines on his face and his thin body, I can understand Jed's obssession with him! The kissing scene between these two men were interesting as well, passionate for the crazy one and anger for the normal one. Overall a fantastic performance by Daniel Craig, and well supported by other actors as well, such as Bill Nighy. Somehow though I can't take Bill Nighy seriously as a serious actor because I kept thinking of Slartibartfast.

There are very few actors in here so there isn't much supporting cast.

Whilst the performances are generally excellent with the exception of a deadpan one, and the story whilst not entirely predictable but is quite suspenseful although very slow, it is the execution of the story that is the most interesting to me. The beginning scene with the balloon will draw you in, it will shock you and the lack of background music only helped to amplify and heighten the tension and that scene has my vote as one of the best on how to start a scene. The ending was memorable and scary as well whilst the shocker moment was what Jed did to Claire when Joe wanted to leave. I only wished there were more scenes between Jed and Joe, those confrontation scene although Joe's increasing paranoia and obsession is interesting to watch also.

Overall, an excellent movie in my opinion.

Verdict
If you expect action packed film, this is not the one. Watch this for the story or even watch this for Daniel Craig and Rhys Ifans. It is slow but sure, silent, threatening and well acted. Enduring love? Interesting title.

Share:

Labels, Archive and the usual sidebar contents are at the bottom of this page.